Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291629›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2020

Blood Microbiome: A New Marker of Gut Microbial Population in Dogs?

Elisa Scarsella, Misa Sandri, Simeone Dal Monego, Danilo Licastro, Bruno Stefanon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofFrontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bacteria in the blood of healthy stray dogs infested by ticks in northern Mexico.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Human circulating bacteria and dysbiosis in non-infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa ScarsellaDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1463-4608
Misa SandriDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Simeone Dal MonegoARGO Open Lab Platform for Genome Sequencing, AREA Science Park, Padriciano, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Danilo LicastroARGO Open Lab Platform for Genome Sequencing, AREA Science Park, Padriciano, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Bruno StefanonDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-5830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of the microbial population in different compartments of the organism, such as the gastrointestinal tract, is now possible thanks to the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing technique. Several studies in the companion animals field have already investigated the fecal microbiome in healthy or sick subjects; however, the methodologies used in the different laboratories and the limited number of animals recruited in each experiment do not allow a straight comparison among published results. Previously, our research focused on the characterization of the microbial taxa variability in 340 fecal samples from 132 healthy dogs, collected serially from several in-house experiments. The results supported the responsiveness of microbiota to dietary and sex factors and allowed us to cluster dogs with high accuracy. For the present study, intestinal and blood microbiota of healthy dogs from different breeds, genders, ages and food habits were collected, with three principal aims: firstly, to confirm the results of our previous study regarding the fecal microbiome affected by the different type of diet; secondly, to investigate the existence of a blood microbial population, even in heathy subjects; and thirdly, to seek for a possible connection between the fecal and the blood microbiota. Limited researches have been published on blood microbiota in humans, and this is the first evidence of the presence of a bacterial population in the blood of dogs. Moreover, gut and blood microbiota can discriminate the animals by factors such as diet, suggesting some relationship between them. These preliminary results make us believe in the use of the blood microbiome for diagnostic purposes, such as researching and preventing gut inflammatory diseases.

Indexed as

blooddogguthealthymicrobiotanutrition

Identifiers

PMID33291629
PMCPMC7761930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.