ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Temporal Aggregation Effects in Spatiotemporal Traffic Modelling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Repair Method for Missing Traffic Data Based on FCM, Optimized by the Twice Grid Optimization and Sparrow Search Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatiotemporal models are a popular tool for urban traffic forecasting, and their correct specification is a challenging task. Temporal aggregation of traffic sensor data series is a critical component of model specification, which determines the spatial structure and affects models' forecasting accuracy. Through extensive experiments with real-world data, we investigated the effects of the selected temporal aggregation level for forecasting performance of different spatiotemporal model specifications. A set of analysed models include travel-time-based and correlation-based spatially restricted vector autoregressive models, compared to classical univariate and multivariate time series models. Research experiments are executed in several dimensions: temporal aggregation levels, forecasting horizons (one-step and multi-step forecasts), spatial complexity (sequential and complex spatial structures), the spatial restriction approach (unrestricted, travel-time-based and correlation-based), and series transformation (original and detrended traffic volumes). The obtained results demonstrate the crucial role of the temporal aggregation level for identification of the spatiotemporal traffic flow structure and selection of the best model specification. We conclude that the common research practice of an arbitrary selection of the temporal aggregation level could lead to incorrect conclusions on optimal model specification. Thus, we recommend extending the traffic forecasting methodology by validation of existing and newly developed model specifications for different temporal aggregation levels. Additionally, we provide empirical results on the selection of the optimal temporal aggregation level for the discussed spatiotemporal models for different forecasting horizons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.