Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291454›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Maria C Riesco-Martinez, Carlos Fernandez-Martos, Cristina Gravalos-Castro, Paula Espinosa-Olarte, Anna La Salvia, Luis Robles-Diaz, Andrea Modrego-Sanchez, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Is a Predictor for Complete Pathological Response in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria C Riesco-MartinezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Fernandez-MartosMedical Oncology Department, Initia Oncology, Hospital Quironsalud, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Cristina Gravalos-CastroMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Paula Espinosa-OlarteMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Anna La SalviaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5020-8657
Luis Robles-DiazMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Andrea Modrego-SanchezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodality treatment is a standard of care for LARC, but the optimal sequencing of the treatment modalities remains unclear. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs. standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with inconsistent results. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of complete pathological response (pCR) rate, disease-free and overall survival vs. standard CRT in LARC. A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and meeting abstracts up to May 2020. RCTs comparing CRT vs. TNT followed by surgery in LARC were eligible for the study. Study selection and data extraction were done following PRISMA guidelines by two independent reviewers. The Mantel-Haenzel method was used to obtain a fixed-effects model of pooled odds or hazard ratios for the main outcomes. Eight RCTs, including 2301 patients, met the eligibility criteria. TNT significantly improved pCR rate (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.49;

Indexed as

chemotherapymeta-analysisneoadjuvant therapyrectal cancertreatment

Identifiers

PMID33291454
PMCPMC7762140
OpenAlexW3111609153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.