Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291412›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Data Driven Mathematical Model of Colon Cancer Progression.

Arkadz Kirshtein, Shaya Akbarinejad, Wenrui Hao, Trang Le, Sumeyye Su, Rachel A Aronow, Leili Shahriyari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A PDE Model of Breast Tumor Progression in MMTV-PyMT Mice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arkadz KirshteinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1205-3359
Shaya AkbarinejadDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.
Wenrui HaoDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-7424
Trang LeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.
Sumeyye SuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.
Rachel A AronowDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.
Leili ShahriyariDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6234-8449
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Data-driven QSP software for personalized colon cancer treatmentR21CA242933 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI PAL, SUVRA, ROY, SOUVIK · 2019 to 2020
$547k
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health R21CA242933NCI NIH HHS R21 CA242933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every colon cancer has its own unique characteristics, and therefore may respond differently to identical treatments. Here, we develop a data driven mathematical model for the interaction network of key components of immune microenvironment in colon cancer. We estimate the relative abundance of each immune cell from gene expression profiles of tumors, and group patients based on their immune patterns. Then we compare the tumor sensitivity and progression in each of these groups of patients, and observe differences in the patterns of tumor growth between the groups. For instance, in tumors with a smaller density of naive macrophages than activated macrophages, a higher activation rate of macrophages leads to an increase in cancer cell density, demonstrating a negative effect of macrophages. Other tumors however, exhibit an opposite trend, showing a positive effect of macrophages in controlling tumor size. Although the results indicate that for all patients the size of the tumor is sensitive to the parameters related to macrophages, such as their activation and death rate, this research demonstrates that no single biomarker could predict the dynamics of tumors.

Indexed as

colon cancerdata driven mathematical modeldendritic cellsgene expression profilesHMGB1immune patternmacrophagessensitivity analysisT-cellstumor deconvolution

Identifiers

PMID33291412
PMCPMC7762015
OpenAlexW3111152816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.