Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291410›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2020

Efficacy and Mode of Action of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.

Cecilie Hoeeg, Sabina Frljak, Abbas Ali Qayyum, Bojan Vrtovec, Jens Kastrup, Annette Ekblond, Bjarke Follin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilie HoeegCardiology Stem Cell Centre, Department of Cardiology, Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Henrik Harpestrengs Vej 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-7824
Sabina FrljakAdvanced Heart Failure and Transplantation Center, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abbas Ali QayyumCardiology Stem Cell Centre, Department of Cardiology, Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Henrik Harpestrengs Vej 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bojan VrtovecAdvanced Heart Failure and Transplantation Center, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jens KastrupCardiology Stem Cell Centre, Department of Cardiology, Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Henrik Harpestrengs Vej 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette EkblondCardiology Stem Cell Centre, Department of Cardiology, Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Henrik Harpestrengs Vej 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bjarke FollinCardiology Stem Cell Centre, Department of Cardiology, Centre for Cardiac, Vascular, Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Henrik Harpestrengs Vej 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-4168
University of Copenhagen · DKLjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

Innovationsfonden 6153-00002B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) constitutes one of the most common causes to non-ischemic heart failure. Despite treatment, the disease often progresses, causing severe morbidity and mortality, making novel treatment strategies necessary. Due to the regenerative actions of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), they have been proposed as a treatment for NIDCM. This systematic review aims to evaluate efficacy and mode of action (MoA) of MSC-based therapies in NIDCM. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (Pubmed) and Embase. A total of 27 studies were included (3 clinical trials and 24 preclinical studies). MSCs from different tissues and routes of delivery were reported, with bone marrow-derived MSCs and direct intramyocardial injections being the most frequent. All included clinical trials and 22 preclinical trials reported an improvement in cardiac function following MSC treatment. Furthermore, preclinical studies demonstrated alterations in tissue structure, gene, and protein expression patterns, primarily related to fibrosis and angiogenesis. Consequently, MSC treatment can improve cardiac function in NIDCM patients. The MoA underlying this effect involves anti-fibrosis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and anti-apoptosis, though these processes seem to be interdependent. These encouraging results calls for larger confirmatory clinical studies, as well as preclinical studies utilizing unbiased investigation of the potential MoA.

Indexed as

dilated cardiomyopathymesenchymal stem cellsmode of actionregeneration

Identifiers

PMID33291410
PMCPMC7762005
OpenAlexW3112193266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.