Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291266›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Utility of Deep Learning in Breast Ultrasonic Imaging: A Review.

Tomoyuki Fujioka, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Jun Oyama, Emi Yamaga, Yuka Yashima, Leona Katsuta, Kyoko Nomura, Miyako Nara, Goshi Oda and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-8901
Mio MoriDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-4519
Kazunori KubotaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3240-4910
Jun OyamaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Emi YamagaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-6507
Yuka YashimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Leona KatsutaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Kyoko NomuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Miyako NaraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5241-895X
Goshi OdaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Tsuyoshi NakagawaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-0445
Yoshio KitazumeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Ukihide TateishiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

Japan Radiological Society Bayer Research Grant Japan Radiological Society Bayer Research Grant 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women; it poses a serious threat to women's health. Thus, early detection and proper treatment can improve patient prognosis. Breast ultrasound is one of the most commonly used modalities for diagnosing and detecting breast cancer in clinical practice. Deep learning technology has made significant progress in data extraction and analysis for medical images in recent years. Therefore, the use of deep learning for breast ultrasonic imaging in clinical practice is extremely important, as it saves time, reduces radiologist fatigue, and compensates for a lack of experience and skills in some cases. This review article discusses the basic technical knowledge and algorithms of deep learning for breast ultrasound and the application of deep learning technology in image classification, object detection, segmentation, and image synthesis. Finally, we discuss the current issues and future perspectives of deep learning technology in breast ultrasound.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreastdeep learningmachine learningneural networkultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33291266
PMCPMC7762151
OpenAlexW3110722024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.