Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291263›Full record

ReviewToxins2020

The Failures of Ethnobotany and Phytomedicine in Delivering Novel Treatments for Snakebite Envenomation.

Steven A Trim, Carol M Trim, Harry F Williams, Sakthivel Vaiyapuri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven A TrimVenomtech Ltd., Sandwich, Kent CT13 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-4115
Carol M TrimSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK.
Harry F WilliamsToxiven Biotech Private Limited, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641042, India.
Sakthivel VaiyapuriSchool of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6006-6517
Canterbury Christ Church University · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenomation (SBE) is a high-priority, neglected tropical disease. This devastating occupational health hazard disproportionately affects rural farming communities in tropical countries. This is exacerbated by the distribution and densities of venomous snakes, incidence of encounters, and limited access to advanced healthcare, including antivenom. Before the development of antivenom, desperation and spiritual beliefs led patients to experiment with a wide range of traditional treatments. Many of these treatments still survive today, particularly in regions where access to healthcare is limited. Plants are a major source of bioactive molecules, including several lifesaving medications that are widely used to this day. However, much of the research into the use of traditional plant treatments for SBE are limited to preliminary analysis or have focused on techniques used to confirm antibody efficacy that are not suitable for non-antibody-containing treatments. Modern drugs are developed through a robust pharmaceutical drug discovery and development process, which applies as much to SBE as it does to any other disease. This review discusses specifically why research into ethnobotanical practices has failed to identify or develop a novel treatment for SBE and proposes specific approaches that should be considered in this area of research in the future.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyAnimalsBiomedical ResearchEthnobotanyHumansPlant ExtractsSnake BitesTreatment OutcomePlant Extractsdrug discoveryenvenomationethnobotanymedicinal plantsphytomedicinesnakebitetraditional treatments

Identifiers

PMID33291263
PMCPMC7762085
OpenAlexW3111414571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.