Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

How Many Urine Samples Are Needed to Accurately Assess Exposure to Non-Persistent Chemicals? The Biomarker Reliability Assessment Tool (BRAT) for Scientists, Research Sponsors, and Risk Managers.

Marc-André Verner, Hassan Salame, Conrad Housand, Linda S Birnbaum, Maryse F Bouchard, Jonathan Chevrier, Lesa L Aylward, Daniel Q Naiman, Judy S LaKind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Silicone Wristbands in Exposure Assessment: Analytical Considerations and Comparison with Other Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc-André VernerDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.
Hassan SalameDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-6173
Conrad HousandIndependent Consultant, Winter Springs, FL 32708, USA.
Linda S BirnbaumScientist Emeritus and Former Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC 27514, USA.
Maryse F BouchardDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.
Jonathan ChevrierDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.
Lesa L AylwardSummit Toxicology, LLP, Falls Church, VA 22044, USA.
Daniel Q NaimanDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Judy S LaKindLaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, MD 21228, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-9178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In epidemiologic and exposure research, biomonitoring is often used as the basis for assessing human exposure to environmental chemicals. Studies frequently rely on a single urinary measurement per participant to assess exposure to non-persistent chemicals. However, there is a growing consensus that single urine samples may be insufficient for adequately estimating exposure. The question then arises: how many samples would be needed for optimal characterization of exposure? To help researchers answer this question, we developed a tool called the Biomarker Reliability Assessment Tool (BRAT). The BRAT is based on pharmacokinetic modeling simulations, is freely available, and is designed to help researchers determine the approximate number of urine samples needed to optimize exposure assessment. The BRAT performs Monte Carlo simulations of exposure to estimate internal levels and resulting urinary concentrations in individuals from a population based on user-specified inputs (e.g., biological half-life, within- and between-person variability in exposure). The BRAT evaluates-through linear regression and quantile classification-the precision/accuracy of the estimation of internal levels depending on the number of urine samples. This tool should guide researchers towards more robust biomonitoring and improved exposure classification in epidemiologic and exposure research, which should in turn improve the translation of that research into decision-making.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsUrinalysisBiomarkersEnvironmental ExposureHumansMonte Carlo MethodReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentBiomarkersEnvironmental Pollutantsbiomonitoringenvironmental epidemiologyexposure assessmentexposure misclassificationnon-persistent chemicalspharmacokinetic modelingurine samplingwithin- and between-person variability

Identifiers

PMID33291237
PMCPMC7730379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.