Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Impact of Social Support on Public Anxiety amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.

Yibin Ao, Hao Zhu, Fanrong Meng, Yan Wang, Gui Ye, Linchuan Yang, Na Dong, Igor Martek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Relationship between Income and Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yibin AoCollege of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Hao ZhuCollege of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Fanrong MengCollege of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Engineering Management, Sichuan College of Architectural Technology, Deyang 618000, China.
Gui YeSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China.
Linchuan YangSchool of Architecture and Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6070-9044
Na DongCollege of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Igor MartekSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Chengdu University of Technology · CNChongqing University · CNDeakin University · AUSichuan Institute of Building Research · CNSichuan University · CNSouthwest Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent coronavirus outbreak has captured worldwide attention. This study investigated the anxiety of the Chinese public and its relationship with social support during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby providing empirical support for interventions on improving the public's mental health. On the basis of an online questionnaire survey conducted on 10-18 February 2020, this study shows that 19.8%, 68.5%, and 11.1% of the respondents suffered mild anxiety, moderate anxiety, and severe anxiety, respectively. Significant differences are reported in state anxiety between people with different household incomes. There are significant differences in trait anxiety and state anxiety between different social support groups. Social support and trait anxiety are negatively correlated. Social support and state anxiety are negatively correlated. Social support affects state anxiety both directly and indirectly (through the mediation of trait anxiety). Therefore, during the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing public support for society can effectively reduce public anxiety.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdolescentAdultAnxietyChinaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)ChinaCOVID-19epidemicmental healthpandemicpublic anxietysocial supportSocial Support Rating ScaleState–Trait Anxiety Inventory

Identifiers

PMID33291217
PMCPMC7730358
OpenAlexW3111013973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.