Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33290503›Full record

ArticleBritish medical bulletin2021

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of biofluids for osteoarthritis.

Emily J Clarke, James R Anderson, Mandy J Peffers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British medical bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily J ClarkeInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
James R AndersonInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Mandy J PeffersInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Centre for Life · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilVersus ArthritisWellcome Trust 107471/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis is a common degenerative musculoskeletal disease of synovial joints. It is characterized by a metabolic imbalance resulting in articular cartilage degradation, reduced elastoviscosity of synovial fluid and an altered chondrocyte phenotype. This is often associated with reduced mobility, pain and poor quality of life. Subsequently, with an ageing world population, osteoarthritis is of increasing concern to public health. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy can be applied to characterize the metabolomes of biofluids, determining changes associated with osteoarthritis pathology, identifying potential biomarkers of disease and alterations to metabolic pathways. SOURCES OF DATA: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science databases using combinations of the following keywords: 'NMR Spectroscopy', 'Blood', 'Plasma', 'Serum', 'Urine', 'Synovial Fluid' and 'Osteoarthritis' for articles published from 2000 to 2020. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: The number of urine metabolomics studies using NMR spectroscopy to investigate osteoarthritis is low, whereas the use of synovial fluid is significantly higher. Several differential metabolites have previously been identified and mapped to metabolic pathways involved in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Conclusions are sometimes conservative or overinflated, which may reflect the variation in reporting standards. NMR metabolic experimental design may require further consideration, as do the animal models used for such studies. GROWING POINTS: There are various aspects which require improvement within the field. These include stricter adherence to the Metabolomics Standards Initiative, inclusive of the standardization of metabolite identifications; increased utilization of integrating NMR metabolomics with other 'omic' disciplines; and increased deposition of raw experimental files into open access online repositories, allowing greater transparency and enabling additional future analyses. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Overall, this research area could be improved by the inclusion of more heterogeneous cohorts, reflecting varying osteoarthritis phenotypes, and larger group sizes ensuring studies are not underpowered. To correlate local and systemic environments, the use of blood for diagnostic purposes, over the collection of synovial fluid, requires increased attention. This will ultimately enable biomarkers of disease to be determined that may provide an earlier diagnosis, or provide potential therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis, ultimately improving patient prognosis.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisQuality of LifeAnimalsBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsSynovial FluidBiomarkersbiofluidsmetabolomicsnuclear magnetic resonanceosteoarthritisplasmaserumsynovial fluidurine

Identifiers

PMID33290503
PMCPMC7995852
OpenAlexW3112876016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.