ArticlePloS one2020
Mechanics of biofilms formed of bacteria with fimbriae appendages.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial cell envelope components of gut commensals: effects in host-microbe interaction.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Probiogenomic analysis ofHeliyon · 2025Article
- Competitive behaviors in Serratia marcescens are coordinately regulated by a lifestyle switch frequently inactivated in the clinical environment.Cell host & microbe · 2025Article
- The Impact of Fluid Flow on Microbial Growth and Distribution in Food Processing Systems.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Linalool disruptsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- In vitro study of probiotic Lactobacillus helveticus: Antibacterial effects on Porphyromonas gingivalis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Classical and Modern Models for Biofilm Studies: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The role of filamentous matrix molecules in shaping the architecture and emergent properties of bacterial biofilms.The Biochemical journal · 2024Review
- Possibly pathogenic bacteria in aerosols and foams as a result of aeration remediation in a polluted urban waterway.Folia microbiologica · 2024Article
- The Characteristic of Biofilm Formation in ESBL-ProducingThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024Article
- Evaluating disinfectant efficacy on mixed biofilms comprising Shiga toxigenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The interplay between bacterial biofilms, encrustation, and wall shear stress in ureteral stents: a review across scales.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- The DNA relaxation-dependent OFF-to-ON biasing of the type 1 fimbrial genetic switch requires the Fis nucleoid-associated protein.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
- Diversity in Genetic Regulation of Bacterial Fimbriae Assembled by the Chaperone Usher Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Adhesion of Rhodococcus bacteria to solid hydrocarbons and enhanced biodegradation of these compounds.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Permeation Increases Biofilm Development in Nanofiltration Membranes Operated with Varying Feed Water Phosphorous Concentrations.Membranes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gram-negative bacteria, as well as some Gram-positive bacteria, possess hair-like appendages known as fimbriae, which play an important role in adhesion of the bacteria to surfaces or to other bacteria. Unlike the sex pili or flagellum, the fimbriae are quite numerous, with of order 1000 fimbriae appendages per bacterial cell. In this paper, a recently developed hybrid model for bacterial biofilms is used to examine the role of fimbriae tension force on the mechanics of bacterial biofilms. Each bacterial cell is represented in this model by a spherocylindrical particle, which interact with each other through collision, adhesion, lubrication force, and fimbrial force. The bacterial cells absorb water and nutrients and produce extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). The flow of water and EPS, and nutrient diffusion within these substances, is computed using a continuum model that accounts for important effects such as osmotic pressure gradient, drag force on the bacterial cells, and viscous shear. The fimbrial force is modeled using an outer spherocylinder capsule around each cell, which can transmit tensile forces to neighboring cells with which the fimbriae capsule collides. We find that the biofilm structure during the growth process is dominated by a balance between outward drag force on the cells due to the EPS flow away from the bacterial colony and the inward tensile fimbrial force acting on chains of cells connected by adhesive fimbriae appendages. The fimbrial force also introduces a large rotational motion of the cells and disrupts cell alignment caused by viscous torque imposed by the EPS flow. The current paper characterizes the competing effects of EPS drag and fimbrial force using a series of computations with different values of the ratio of EPS to bacterial cell production rate and different numbers of fimbriae per cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.