Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289822›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of Co-trimoxazole (Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole) vs Placebo on Death, Lung Transplant, or Hospital Admission in Patients With Moderate and Severe Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: The EME-TIPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Andrew M Wilson, Allan B Clark, Tony Cahn, Edwin R Chilvers, William Fraser, Matthew Hammond, David M Livermore, Toby M Maher, Helen Parfrey, Ann Marie Swart and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of bias attributable to composite outcome in clinical trials published in 2019-2020: a systematic review.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Effect of breathing exercises on patients with interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Gut microbiota associate with disease severity and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The lung microbiome in interstitial lung disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew M WilsonNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Allan B ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Tony CahnDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Bedford Hospitals NHS Trust, South Wing, Bedford, United Kingdom.
Edwin R ChilversNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
William FraserNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Matthew HammondNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
David M LivermoreNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Toby M MaherDepartment of Endocrinology and Clinical Biochemistry, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Helen ParfreyRoyal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Road, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ann Marie SwartNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Susan StirlingNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
David R ThickettInstitute of Inflammation and Aging, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Moira WhyteMRC Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
EME-TIPAC team
Norwich Research Park · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBBedford Hospital NHS Trust · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBImperial College London · GBPapworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2013-13-017Medical Research Council MC_PC_14145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Patients with IPF have altered lung microbiota, with bacterial burden within the lungs associated with mortality; previous studies have suggested benefit with co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). Objective: To determine the efficacy of co-trimoxazole in patients with moderate and severe IPF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel randomized trial of 342 patients with IPF, breathlessness (Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score >1), and impaired lung function (forced vital capacity ≤75% predicted) conducted in 39 UK specialist interstitial lung disease centers between April 2015 (first patient visit) and April 2019 (last patient follow-up). Interventions: Study participants were randomized to receive 960 mg of oral co-trimoxazole twice daily (n = 170) or matched placebo (n = 172) for between 12 and 42 months. All patients received 5 mg of folic acid orally once daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to death (all causes), lung transplant, or first nonelective hospital admission. There were 15 secondary outcomes, including the individual components of the primary end point respiratory-related events, lung function (forced vital capacity and gas transfer), and patient-reported outcomes (Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, 5-level EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, cough severity, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire scores). Results: Among 342 individuals who were randomized (mean age, 71.3 years; 46 [13%] women), 283 (83%) completed the trial. The median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 1.02 (0.35-1.73) years. Events per person-year of follow-up among participants randomized to the co-trimoxazole and placebo groups were 0.45 (84/186) and 0.38 (80/209), respectively, with a hazard ratio of 1.2 ([95% CI, 0.9-1.6]; P = .32). There were no statistically significant differences in other event outcomes, lung function, or patient-reported outcomes. Patients in the co-trimoxazole group had 696 adverse events (nausea [n = 89], diarrhea [n = 52], vomiting [n = 28], and rash [n = 31]) and patients in the placebo group had 640 adverse events (nausea [n = 67], diarrhea [n = 84], vomiting [n = 20], and rash [n = 20]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate or severe IPF, treatment with oral co-trimoxazole did not reduce a composite outcome of time to death, transplant, or nonelective hospitalization compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN17464641.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedCoughDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHospitalizationHumansIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung TransplantationMaleNauseaPatient AcuityTreatment FailureTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID33289822
PMCPMC7724556
OpenAlexW3112400172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.