Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289788›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2021

The diagnostic and prognostic values of microRNA-196a in cancer.

Mengqiu Xiong, Ping Wang, Bei Pan, Junjie Nie, Shukui Wang, Bangshun He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mengqiu Xiong *General Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Ping Wang *Department of Medical Biology, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002,China.
Bei PanMedical College, Southeast University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Junjie NieGeneral Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Shukui WangGeneral Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Bangshun HeGeneral Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNSoutheast University · CNWannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA-196a (miR-196a) was previously reported to be up-regulated in cancers, and it has the diagnostic and prognostic values in cancers. Whereas, the conclusion was still unclear according to the published data. To assess such roles of miR-196a in cancers, the present study was conducted based on published data and online cancer-related databases. To identify the relevant published data, we searched articles in databases and then the relevant data were extracted to evaluate the correlation between miR-196a expression and diagnosis, prognosis for cancer patients. The pooled results showed that miR-196a was a valuable diagnostic biomarker in cancer (area under curve (AUC) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.90; sensitivity (SEN) = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.81; specificity (SPE) = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.95), which was consistent with the data from databases (breast cancer: miR-196a-3p: AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.79; miR-196a-5p: AUC = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75; pancreatic cancer: miR-196a-3p: AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87; miR-196a-5p: AUC = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.71). In addition, the pooled result revealed that elevated miR-196a expression in tumor tissues (HR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.79-3.61, PHeterogeneity=0.000, I2 = 75.8%) or serum/plasma (HR = 4.06, 95% CI: 2.67-6.18, PHeterogeneity=0.668, I2 = 0%) of patients was an unfavorable survival biomarker, which was consistent with the data from databases (adrenocortical carcinoma: HR = 5.70; esophageal carcinoma: HR = 1.93; brain lower grade glioma: HR = 2.91; GSE40267: HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.2-5.07; TCGA: HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21-2.74; GSE19783: HR = 4.24, 95% CI: 1-18.06). In short, our results demonstrated that miR-196a in tumor tissue or serum/plasma could be used as a prognostic and diagnostic values for cancers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN196 microRNA, humancancerdiagnosticsmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID33289788
PMCPMC7791550
OpenAlexW3112722186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.