Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289680›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Effects of Unfiltered Cigarettes on Smoking Behavior and Toxicant Exposure: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

Eyal Oren, Kim Pulvers, Devan R Romero, Casey Barber, Erika Carter, Laree A Tracy, Thomas E Novotny

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03749876 (A Randomized Cross-over Clinical Trial of Unfiltered Cigarettes), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03749876 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Cross-over Clinical Trial of Unfiltered Cigarettes

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled37ConditionsCigarette Smoking, Tobacco SmokingArmsUnfiltered Cigarettes, Filtered Cigarettes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eyal Oren *Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-3516
Kim Pulvers *Department of Psychology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-1975
Devan R RomeroDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5196
Casey BarberDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-1873
Erika CarterDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-7866
Laree A Tracy *Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-6204
Thomas E NovotnyDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9235-0582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlastic filters on cigarette butts are a widespread source of nonbiodegradable, toxic environmental waste. State and local legislation to ban the sale of single-use cigarettes may be considered to prevent this waste, but scientific evidence on the impact of switching smokers to unfiltered cigarettes on smoking behavior and toxicant exposures is needed to inform this policy. We have designed an open-label, randomized, 9-week, crossover clinical trial of adult filtered-cigarette smokers who switch to unfiltered cigarettes.

objectiveOur objective is to understand the impact of switching smokers of filtered cigarettes to unfiltered cigarettes on smoking behavior and toxic exposures.

methodsThis trial involves a 1-week baseline period; a 2-week period of smoking filtered or unfiltered cigarettes, where groups are randomly assigned; a 3-week washout period; another 1-week baseline period; and a 2-week crossover period of smoking the opposite condition (ie, filtered or unfiltered cigarettes) for a sufficient sample size of 40 participants. We will determine changes in (1) observed topography (ie, puff count, interpuff interval, and puff volume) and cigarettes smoked per day, via butt counts and self-report, (2) expired carbon monoxide and excretion of urinary cotinine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, and volatile organic compounds, and (3) participants' knowledge and attitudes toward unfiltered cigarettes, satisfaction with smoking, and intention to quit if they were not able to smoke filtered cigarettes.

resultsThis study was funded in June 2018 and approved by the relevant Institutional Review Boards in July 2018. This study has enrolled 37 participants as of October 2020. Data analysis is currently underway, and trial results are expected to be published in spring 2021.

conclusionsThis pilot proof-of-principle study will inform the design of a larger, future research project that can provide robust scientific evidence on our research question. Such a large study could inform possible state or local legislation to ban the sale of single-use filtered cigarettes in order to mitigate the environmental impact of discarded single-use plastic filters.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03749876; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03749876. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19603.

Indexed as

environmentalexposurenicotinepolicytobaccotopography

Identifiers

PMID33289680
PMCPMC7755531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.