Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289610›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2021

Racism and Bioethics: The Myth of Color Blindness.

Clarence H Braddock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intersectionality as a tool for clinical ethics consultation in mental healthcare.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Black Bioethics in the Age of Black Lives Matter.The Journal of medical humanities · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Retrospective Analysis of Equity-Based Optimization for COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Feminist perspectives in German-language medical ethics: a review and three hypotheses].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Putting Anti-Racism into Practice as a Healthcare Ethics Consultant.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. The Case for Health Reparations.Frontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Clarence H BraddockDavid Geffen School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like many fields, bioethics has been constrained to thinking to race in terms of colorblindness, the idea that ideal deliberation would ignore race and hence prevent bias. There are practical and ethically significant problems with colorblind approaches to ethical deliberation, and important reasons why race is ethically relevant. Future discourse needs to understand how and why race is relevant in bioethics.

Indexed as

BioethicsColor Vision DefectsRacismHumansMoralsRace and culture/ethnicityrationing/resource allocation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.