Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289531›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Parallelized calculation of permutation tests.

Markus Ekvall, Michael Höhle, Lukas Käll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus EkvallScience for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.
Michael HöhleDepartment of Mathematics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Lukas KällScience for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPermutation tests offer a straightforward framework to assess the significance of differences in sample statistics. A significant advantage of permutation tests are the relatively few assumptions about the distribution of the test statistic are needed, as they rely on the assumption of exchangeability of the group labels. They have great value, as they allow a sensitivity analysis to determine the extent to which the assumed broad sample distribution of the test statistic applies. However, in this situation, permutation tests are rarely applied because the running time of naïve implementations is too slow and grows exponentially with the sample size. Nevertheless, continued development in the 1980s introduced dynamic programming algorithms that compute exact permutation tests in polynomial time. Albeit this significant running time reduction, the exact test has not yet become one of the predominant statistical tests for medium sample size. Here, we propose a computational parallelization of one such dynamic programming-based permutation test, the Green algorithm, which makes the permutation test more attractive.

resultsParallelization of the Green algorithm was found possible by non-trivial rearrangement of the structure of the algorithm. A speed-up-by orders of magnitude-is achievable by executing the parallelized algorithm on a GPU. We demonstrate that the execution time essentially becomes a non-issue for sample sizes, even as high as hundreds of samples. This improvement makes our method an attractive alternative to, e.g. the widely used asymptotic Mann-Whitney U-test. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: In Python 3 code from the GitHub repository https://github.com/statisticalbiotechnology/parallelPermutationTest under an Apache 2.0 license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID33289531
PMCPMC8016463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.