ArticleNeurosurgery2021
The Relationship Between Stimulation Current and Functional Site Localization During Brain Mapping.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on arousal and alertness among traumatic brain injury patients with disorders of consciousness or persistent vegetative State: a systematic review.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Pooled it
- Intraoperative functional brain mapping for glioma surgery: a comprehensive review of the University of California San Francisco mapping protocol.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Altered cortical excitability in tuberous sclerosis and the effect of mTOR inhibitors: An intracranial electrical stimulation study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Contemporary Precision Stratification and Prognostic Features of Primary Gliomas in a Southern Chinese Population.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Voxel-based mapping of postoperative epilepsy risk in glioma patients: supplementary motor area and limbic system correlations.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A Novel Intraoperative Mapping Device Detects the Thermodynamic Response Function.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGliomas are often in close proximity to functional regions of the brain; therefore, electrocortical stimulation (ECS) mapping is a common technique utilized during glioma resection to identify functional areas. Stimulation-induced seizure (SIS) remains the most common reason for aborted procedures. Few studies have focused on oncological factors impacting cortical stimulation thresholds.
objectiveTo examine oncological factors thought to impact stimulation threshold in order to understand whether a linear relationship exists between stimulation current and number of functional cortical sites identified.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed single-institution prospectively collected brain mapping data of patients with dominant hemisphere gliomas. Comparisons of stimulation threshold were made using t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between oncologic factors and stimulation threshold were made using multivariate regressions. The association between stimulation current and number of positive sites was made using a Poisson model.
resultsOf the 586 patients included in the study, SIS occurred in 3.92% and the rate of SIS events differed by cortical location (frontal 8.5%, insular 1.6%, parietal 1.3%, and temporal 2.8%; P = .009). Stimulation current was lower when mapping frontal cortex (P = .002). Stimulation current was not associated with tumor plus peritumor edema volume, world health organization) (WHO grade, histology, or isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status but was associated with tumor volume within the frontal lobe (P = .018). Stimulation current was not associated with number of positive sites identified during ECS mapping (P = .118).
conclusionSISs are rare but serious events during ECS mapping. SISs are most common when mapping the frontal lobe. Greater stimulation current is not associated with the identification of more cortical functional sites during glioma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.