Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289505›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgery2021

Clinical Pearls and Methods for Intraoperative Awake Language Mapping.

Ramin A Morshed, Jacob S Young, Anthony T Lee, Mitchel S Berger, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trends and Demographic Disparities in the Utilization of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the United States, 2008 to 2021.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2026
    Article
  6. A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony T Lee
Mitchel S Berger
Shawn L Hervey-JumperORCID 0000-0003-4699-260X
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Intratumoral functional connectivity with implications on synaptogenesis and aphasia recovery in adult astrocytic WHO II-III gliomaK08NS110919 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HERVEY-JUMPER, SHAWN L. · 2019 to 2023
$1.0M
Loglio CollectiveNCI NIH HHS L30 CA199570NINDS NIH HHS K08 110919-01NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS110919Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 74259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative language mapping of tumor and peritumor tissue is a well-established technique for avoiding permanent neurological deficits and maximizing extent of resection. Although there are several components of language that may be tested intraoperatively (eg, naming, writing, reading, and repetition), there is a lack of consistency in how patients are tested intraoperatively as well as the techniques involved to ensure safety during an awake procedure. Here, we review appropriate patient selection, neuroanesthetic techniques, cortical and subcortical language mapping stimulation paradigms, and selection of intraoperative language tasks used during awake craniotomies. We also expand on existing language mapping reviews by considering how intensity and timing of electrical stimulation may impact interpretation of mapping results.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsWakefulnessBrain MappingCraniotomyElectric StimulationHumansLanguageMonitoring, IntraoperativeAwake craniotomyDirect cortical stimulationLanguage mapping

Identifiers

PMID33289505
PMCPMC8279835
OpenAlexW3111824122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.