Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289351›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2021

Clinical utility of circulating tumor cells: an update.

Antoine Vasseur, Nicolas Kiavue, François-Clément Bidard, Jean-Yves Pierga, Luc Cabel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine VasseurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paris and Saint-Cloud Institut Curie, France.
Nicolas KiavueDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paris and Saint-Cloud Institut Curie, France.
François-Clément BidardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paris and Saint-Cloud Institut Curie, France.
Jean-Yves PiergaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paris and Saint-Cloud Institut Curie, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2863-9995
Luc CabelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Paris and Saint-Cloud Institut Curie, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been clearly demonstrated in many types of cancer. However, their roles in diagnostic and treatment strategies remain to be defined. In this review, we present an overview of the current clinical validity of CTCs in nonmetastatic and metastatic cancer, and the main studies or concepts investigating the clinical utility of CTCs. In particular, we focus on breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer. Two major topics concerning the clinical utility of CTC are discussed: treatment based on CTC count or CTC variations, and treatment based on the molecular characteristics of CTCs. Although some of these studies are inconclusive, many are still ongoing, and their results could help to define the role of CTCs in the management of cancers. A summary of published or ongoing phase II-III trials is also presented.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEarly Detection of CancerHumansNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingReproducibility of ResultsTumor Cells, Culturedcirculating tumor cellsclinical utilityclinical validityCTC-derived xenograftsliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33289351
PMCPMC8169442
OpenAlexW3109884743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.