Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289194›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2021

"I got tested at home, the help came to me": acceptability and feasibility of home-based TB testing of household contacts using portable molecular diagnostics in South Africa.

Andrew Medina-Marino, Lindsey de Vos, Dana Bezuidenhout, Claudia M Denkinger, Samuel G Schumacher, Sanghyuk S Shin, Wendy Stevens, Grant Theron, Martie van der Walt, Joseph Daniels

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diagnosing Tuberculosis: What Do New Technologies Allow Us to (Not) Do?Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew Medina-MarinoResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
Lindsey de VosResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
Dana BezuidenhoutResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
Claudia M DenkingerFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samuel G SchumacherFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sanghyuk S ShinSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Wendy StevensDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Grant TheronDSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Martie van der WaltMedical Research Council, Tuberculosis Platform, Pretoria, South Africa.
Joseph DanielsCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CHFoundation for Professional Development · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZACharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Identifying Men's Preferences for a Male-Centered TB Care InterventionR21AI148852 · NIAID · FOUNDATION FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT · PI DANIELS, JOSEPH, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2020 to 2021
$318k
Investigating the acceptability and feasibility of home-based TB testing of household contacts using a new, mobile point-of-care technologyR21EB023679 · NIBIB · FOUNDATION FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT · PI MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2016 to 2017
$297k
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health R21EB023679NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI148852NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB023679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe effectiveness of household contact investigations is limited by low referral uptake for clinic-based TB testing by symptomatic household contacts. We qualitatively investigated the acceptability and perceived benefits of home-based TB testing using a portable GeneXpert-I instrument (GX-I) in an urban South African township.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with household contacts tested and those that observed testing. Semi-structured interviews explored household contact's understanding of TB, perceptions of the GX-I device and testing procedures, confidentiality, willingness to refer others, and views on home- vs. clinic-based testing. Focus group discussions with home-based TB testing implementing staff assessed operational considerations for scale-up. Data were analysed using a constant comparison approach to qualitatively evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of home-based TB testing.

resultsThirty in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions were conducted. Observing one's own sputum being tested resulted in an emergent trust in home-based TB testing, the GX-I device and one's test results. Home-based TB testing was considered convenient, helped to overcome apathy towards testing and mitigated barriers to clinic-based testing. Perceptions that home-based TB testing contributes to improved household and community health resulted in an emergent theme of alleviation of health insecurities. Operational concerns regarding inadvertent disclosure of one's diagnosis to household members and time spent in people's homes were identified.

conclusionsHome-based TB testing was acceptable and feasible. Individuals expressed belief in the machine by being able to witness the testing process. Though most themes mirrored qualitative studies of home-based HIV testing, the alleviation of health insecurities theme is unique to home-based TB testing. Future research must evaluate the impact of home-based TB testing on case finding yield, time-to-treatment initiation and household outcomes.

Indexed as

Contact TracingHome Care ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaTuberculosisUrban Populationacceptabilityactive case findingcontact tracingfeasibilityGeneXperthome-based testinghousehold contactsqualitativeSouth Africatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33289194
PMCPMC8060432
OpenAlexW3107923565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.