Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289105›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2021

Commentary: The need for research on PTSD in Children and adolescents - a commentary on Elliot et al. (2020).

Marylène Cloitre, Chris R Brewin, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Mark Shevlin

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marylène CloitreNational Center for PTSD Dissemination and Training Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Chris R BrewinResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Evaldas KazlauskasCenter for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-6220
Brigitte Lueger-SchusterFaculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thanos KaratziasRivers Centre for Traumatic Stress, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Philip HylandSchool of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark ShevlinSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent release of the 11th version of The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11: WHO, 2018) marked a significant departure from the previous similarities between it and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2013) in terms of their conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The ICD-11 proposed a reduced symptom set for PTSD and a sibling disorder called Complex PTSD. There have been numerous studies that have provided support for the integrity of, and distinction between, PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses in adult samples. Elliot and colleagues (2020) have added to the research literature by providing a valuable examination of the differences between ICD and DSM PTSD/CPTSD in a sample of youth aged 8 to 17 years. This commentary reviews this study and reflects on the need for greater understanding of developmental changes in the presentation of PTSD and Complex PTSD.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentAdultChildConcept FormationDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesSiblings

Identifiers

PMID33289105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.