Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289061›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Social Agency as a continuum.

Crystal A Silver, Benjamin W Tatler, Ramakrishna Chakravarthi, Bert Timmermans

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Crystal A SilverSchool of Psychology, School of Psychology, William Guild Building, Kings College, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK. c.silver.19@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-5776
Benjamin W TatlerSchool of Psychology, School of Psychology, William Guild Building, Kings College, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5316-766X
Ramakrishna ChakravarthiSchool of Psychology, School of Psychology, William Guild Building, Kings College, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-047X
Bert TimmermansSchool of Psychology, School of Psychology, William Guild Building, Kings College, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-8912
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sense of Agency, the phenomenology associated with causing one's own actions and corresponding effects, is a cornerstone of human experience. Social Agency can be defined as the Sense of Agency experienced in any situation in which the effects of our actions are related to a conspecific. This can be implemented as the other's reactions being caused by our action, joint action modulating our Sense of Agency, or the other's mere social presence influencing our Sense of Agency. It is currently an open question how such Social Agency can be conceptualized and how it relates to its nonsocial variant. This is because, compared with nonsocial Sense of Agency, the concept of Social Agency has remained oversimplified and underresearched, with disparate empirical paradigms yielding divergent results. Reviewing the empirical evidence and the commonalities and differences between different instantiations of Social Agency, we propose that Social Agency can be conceptualized as a continuum, in which the degree of cooperation is the key dimension that determines our Sense of Agency, and how it relates to nonsocial Sense of Agency. Taking this perspective, we review how the different factors that typically influence Sense of Agency affect Social Agency, and in the process highlight outstanding empirical questions within the field. Finally, concepts from wider research areas are discussed in relation to the ecological validity of Social Agency paradigms, and we provide recommendations for future methodology.

Indexed as

Self ConceptSocial BehaviorHumansCooperationJoint actionSense of AgencySocial AgencySocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID33289061
PMCPMC8062427
OpenAlexW3101945481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.