Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33289039›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Cost of Delivering 12-Dose Isoniazid and Rifapentine Versus 6 Months of Isoniazid for Tuberculosis Infection in a High-Burden Setting.

Courtney M Yuen, Arman Majidulla, Maria Jaswal, Nauman Safdar, Amyn A Malik, Aamir J Khan, Mercedes C Becerra, Salmaan Keshavjee, Chunling Lu, Hamidah Hussain

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Courtney M YuenDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5219-2599
Arman MajidullaInteractive Research and Development, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maria JaswalGlobal Health Directorate, Indus Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nauman SafdarGlobal Health Directorate, Indus Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amyn A MalikGlobal Health Directorate, Indus Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aamir J KhanHarvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mercedes C BecerraDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Salmaan KeshavjeeDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chunling LuDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hamidah HussainInteractive Research and Development (IRD) Global, Singapore.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USIndus Hospital · PKHarvard University · USInteractive Research and Development · PK

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1084276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful delivery and completion of tuberculosis preventive treatment are necessary for tuberculosis elimination. Shorter preventive treatment regimens currently have higher medication costs, but patients spend less time in care and are more likely to complete treatment. It is unknown how economic costs of successful delivery differ between longer and shorter regimens in high-tuberculosis-burden settings.

methodsWe developed survey instruments to collect costs from program and patient sources, considering costs incurred from when household contacts first entered the health system. We compared the cost per completed course of preventive treatment with either 6 months of daily isoniazid (6H) or 3 months of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP), delivered by the Indus Health Network tuberculosis program in Karachi, Pakistan, between October 2016 and February 2018.

resultsDuring this period, 459 individuals initiated 6H and 643 initiated 3HP; 39% and 61% completed treatment, respectively. Considering costs to both the program and care recipients, the cost per completed course was 394 US dollars (USD) for 6H and 333 USD for 3HP. Using a new 2020 price for rifapentine reduced the cost per completed course of 3HP to 290 USD. Under varying assumptions about drug prices and costs incurred by care recipients, the cost per completed course was lower for 3HP in all scenarios, and the largest cost drivers were the salaries of clinical staff.

conclusionsIn a high-burden setting, the cost of successful delivery of 3HP was lower than that of 6H, driven by higher completion.

Indexed as

Latent TuberculosisTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIsoniazidRifampinAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidRifampinrifapentinechemopreventioncosts and cost analysislatent tuberculosisPakistanrifapentine

Identifiers

PMID33289039
PMCPMC8423476
OpenAlexW3111375365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.