Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288911›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2021

Diversity and dynamism in the cerebellum.

Chris I De Zeeuw, Stephen G Lisberger, Jennifer L Raymond

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Chiari I malformation.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Sensorimotor circuit connectivity as a candidate biomarker for responsiveness to sertraline in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  15. An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  16. Evolutionary implications ofBrain communications · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5628-8187
Stephen G LisbergerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. lisberger@neuro.duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-4361
Jennifer L RaymondDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-747X

Funding

Instructive Signals for Motor LearningR01NS072406 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer L Raymond · 2010 to 2026
$7.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past several years have brought revelations and paradigm shifts in research on the cerebellum. Historically viewed as a simple sensorimotor controller with homogeneous architecture, the cerebellum is increasingly implicated in cognitive functions. It possesses an impressive diversity of molecular, cellular and circuit mechanisms, embedded in a dynamic, recurrent circuit architecture. Recent insights about the diversity and dynamism of the cerebellum provide a roadmap for the next decade of cerebellar research, challenging some old concepts, reinvigorating others and defining major new research directions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumCognitionHumansLearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.