Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288791›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2020

The role of IgE specific for galactose-α-1,3-galactose in predicting cetuximab induced hypersensitivity reaction: a systematic review and a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Cristian Virgil Lungulescu, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Valentina Ghimpau, Stefan Alexandru Artene, Irina Mihaela Cazacu, Alexandru Florian Grecu, Venera Cristina Dinescu, Adina Croitoru, Simona Ruxandra Volovat

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reducing Immunogenicity by Design: Approaches to Minimize Immunogenicity of Monoclonal Antibodies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristian Virgil LungulescuDepartment of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Bogdan Silviu UngureanuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania. boboungureanu@gmail.com.
Adina Turcu-StiolicaDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania. adina.turcu@gmail.com.
Valentina GhimpauPharmacy of Craiova Doctoral School, University of Medicine, Craiova, Romania.
Stefan Alexandru ArteneDepartment Biochemistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Irina Mihaela CazacuFundeni Clinical Institute, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru Florian GrecuDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Medicine & Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Venera Cristina DinescuHealth Promotion and Occupational Medicine Department, University of Medicine & Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Adina CroitoruFundeni Clinical Institute, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania.
Simona Ruxandra VolovatDepartment of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", Iasi, Romania.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROTitu Maiorescu University · ROGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant monoclonal antibodies are used for treating various diseases, from asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease to cancer. Although monoclonal antibodies are known to have fewer toxic reactions compared with the conventional cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, the cases of severe systemic hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) should be acknowledged. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the anti-IgE for galactose-α-1,3-galactose in patients with HSRs to cetuximab. We searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and World of Science databases to July 1st, 2020. We included a total of 6 studies, with 1074 patients. Meta-analysis was performed using bivariate analysis and the random-effect model. The pooled sensitivity was 73% (95% CI 62-81%) and the pooled specificity was 88% (95% CI 79-94%). We had not found significant heterogeneity and, despite some discrepancies in the nature of data available in the analysed studies, we draw the conclusion that the presence of cetuximab specific IgE (anti cetuximab antibody) and/or galactose-α-1,3-galactose shows moderate to high sensitivity and specificity of developing an HSR. More studies are needed to establish a protocol necessary for the proper prediction and avoidance of HSR related to cetuximab.

Indexed as

CetuximabGalactoseHumansImmunoglobulin ECetuximabGalactoseImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID33288791
PMCPMC7721698
OpenAlexW3111674508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.