Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288756›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Changes to information in working memory depend on distinct removal operations.

Hyojeong Kim, Harry R Smolker, Louisa L Smith, Marie T Banich, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06460207 (A 4-day Study of Neurofeedback Training of Cognitive Control in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06460207 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A 4-day Study of Neurofeedback Training of Cognitive Control in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsNeurofeedback, Cognitive Training, Memory, Short-Term, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)ArmsfMRI neurofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maintenance suppression enhances subsequent associative learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. EEG Correlates of Active Removal from Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Decoding Mindfulness With Multivariate Predictive Models.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integration of history information Drives Serial Dependence and Stabilizes Working Memory Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Systems Underlying the Implementation of Working Memory Removal Operations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyojeong KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
Harry R SmolkerInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Louisa L SmithInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Marie T BanichInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Jarrod A Lewis-PeacockDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. jalewpea@utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-465X

Funding

Biasing the Forgetting of Visual MemoriesR01EY028746 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Clearing the Contents of Working Memory: Mechanisms and RepresentationsR21MH108848 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2016 to 2017
$360k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028746NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH108848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Holding information in working memory is essential for cognition, but removing unwanted thoughts is equally important. Here we use multivariate pattern analyses of brain activity to demonstrate the successful manipulation and removal of information from working memory using different strategies including suppressing a specific thought, replacing a thought with a different one, and clearing the mind of all thought. These strategies are supported by distinct brain regions and have differential consequences for allowing new information to be encoded.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNeuroimagingNeurons

Identifiers

PMID33288756
PMCPMC7721711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.