Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288676›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

An imbalanced ratio between PC(16:0/16:0) and LPC(16:0) revealed by lipidomics supports the role of the Lands cycle in ischemic brain injury.

Lifeng Zheng, Chengbin Xie, Ju Zheng, Qiangrui Dong, Tengxiao Si, Jing Zhang, Sheng-Tao Hou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lipidomic Characterization of Muscle and Head ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lifeng ZhengBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Chengbin XieBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Ju ZhengBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Qiangrui DongBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Tengxiao SiBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing ZhangBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Sheng-Tao HouBrain Research Centre and Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: hou.st@sustech.edu.cn.
Southern University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting brain recovery after stroke is challenging as a plethora of inhibitory molecules are produced in the brain preventing it from full healing. Moreover, the full scope of inhibitory molecules produced is not well understood. Here, using a high-sensitivity UPLC-MS-based shotgun lipidomics strategy, we semiquantitively measured the differential lipid contents in the mouse cerebral cortex recovering from a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). The lipidomic data were interrogated using the soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) method involving principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Statistics of the 578 confirmed lipids revealed 84 species were differentially changed during MCAO/reperfusion. The most dynamic changes in lipids occurred between 1 and 7 days post-MCAO, whereas concentrations had subsided to the Sham group level at 14 and 28 days post-MCAO. Quantitative analyses revealed a strong monotonic relationship between the reduction in phosphatidylcholine (PC)(16:0/16:0) and the increase in lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)(16:0) levels (Spearman's Rs = -0.86) during the 1 to 7 days reperfusion period. Inhibition of cPLA2 prevented changes in the ratio between PC(16:0/16:0) and LPC(16:0), indicating altered Land's cycle of PC. A series of in vitro studies showed that LPC(16:0), but not PC(16:0/16:0), was detrimental to the integrity of neuronal growth cones and neuronal viability through evoking intracellular calcium influx. In contrast, PC(16:0/16:0) significantly suppressed microglial secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α, limiting neuroinflammation pathways. Together, these data support the role of the imbalanced ratio between PC(16:0/16:0) and LPC(16:0), maintained by Lands' cycle, in neuronal damage and microglia-mediated inflammatory response during ischemic recovery.

Indexed as

AcylationAnimalsBrain IschemiaCalciumInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryLipid MetabolismLipidomicsLysophosphatidylcholinesMaleMiceNeuronsPhosphatidylcholinesReperfusion InjuryCalciumLysophosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylcholinescerebral ischemiagrowth conelipidomicsLPC(16:0)microglianeurite outgrowthPC(16:0/16:0)UPLC-MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID33288676
PMCPMC7900749
OpenAlexW3111571276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.