Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288370›Full record

ArticleAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Basal cell carcinoma with compromised margins: retrospective study of management, evolution, and prognosis.

Maria Carolina Fidelis, Rafael Fantelli Stelini, Leonardo Piropo Staffa, Aparecida Machado de Moraes, Renata Ferreira Magalhães

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Margins in head and neck non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: clinical/pathological criteria and their impact on oncological outcomes and therapeutic choices. A systematic review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Carolina FidelisDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: carolfidelis@hotmail.com.
Rafael Fantelli SteliniDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo Piropo StaffaOphthalmology Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Aparecida Machado de MoraesDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Renata Ferreira MagalhãesFaculty of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type of malignancy in the Western world, and surgical excision is the preferred approach. The approach adopted in the face of incomplete excisions of basal cell carcinoma is still controversial.

objectivesTo compare the number of tumor recurrences after treatment for incompletely excised basal cell carcinoma.

methodsSelection and statistical analysis of medical records of patients who had compromised margins after excision of basal cell carcinoma in a tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2013.

resultsA total of 120 medical records were analyzed; the mean age was 69.6 years, and 50% of the patients were female. The most prevalent histological type was nodular; the mean size was 1.1 cm, and the tumor location with the highest incidence was the nose. The lateral margin was the most frequently positive. Clinical follow-up was more widely adopted; only 40 patients underwent a second surgery. The total number of patients who had tumor recurrence was 34 (28.3%). Only the malar location significantly influenced the incidence of recurrence (p = 0.02). The mean follow-up time was 29.54 months, with no significant difference between the follow-ups, although 32.9% of the patients followed-up clinically showed recurrence, against only 20% of those who underwent a second surgery. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Mean follow-up time of less than five years and sample size.

conclusionsThe presence of compromised margins does not necessarily imply recurrence. Location, tumor size, histological subtype, previous epithelial tumors, and clinical conditions of the patient must be considered when choosing the best treatment option.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaSkin NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCarcinoma, basal cellFollow-up studiesNeoplasm recurrence, local

Identifiers

PMID33288370
PMCPMC7838108
OpenAlexW3103818460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.