Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33288302›Full record

SynthesisClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Prediction of resting energy expenditure in healthy older adults: A systematic review.

Iolanda Cioffi, Maurizio Marra, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Luca Scalfi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iolanda CioffiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. Electronic address: iolanda.cioffi@unina.it.
Maurizio MarraDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio PasanisiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luca ScalfiDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Pansini 5, 80131 Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsEstimates of energy requirements, based on measured or predicted resting energy expenditure (REE), are needed to avoid undernutrition or overnutrition (and their clinical consequences) in elderly subjects. The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the prediction accuracy of REE in healthy elderly subjects and to ascertain which equation is more reliable at group level and/or individual level.

methodsStudies assessing prediction of REE in general elderly population were systematically searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL until March 2020. Prediction accuracy of REE was assessed at both group (bias) and individual (precision) level for each equation.

resultsFourteen studies met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. Bias was reported in 8 papers and calculated in another 5 from absolute values. There was a prevalent tendency towards an overestimation of REE across the studies. The least bias was observed for the Mifflin (-0.3%) and Harris-Benedict (+2.6%) equations, with values above 5% for the FAO/WHO/UNU, Fredrix and Muller equations. Precision widely varied between studies for the same equation. The higher precision was observed using the Harris-Benedict equation (~70%), while the Henry and Mifflin equations provided estimates within 10% of measured values in 65% and 61% of elderly individuals, respectively.

conclusionsNone of the prediction equations considered provides accurate and precise REE estimates in healthy older adults. However, the best prediction is given by the Mifflin equation at group level and by the Harris-Benedict equation at individual level. Further studies with strong quality design are needed to evaluate the variability and accuracy of REE in the elderly general population.

Indexed as

AgedBasal MetabolismCalorimetry, IndirectGeriatric AssessmentHumansPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsAgingEnergy requirementsIndirect calorimetryResting metabolic rate

Identifiers

PMID33288302
OpenAlexW3106927661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.