Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287865›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Mentalization for Offending Adult Males (MOAM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate mentalization-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in male offenders on community probation.

Peter Fonagy, Jessica Yakeley, Tessa Gardner, Elizabeth Simes, Mary McMurran, Paul Moran, Mike Crawford, Alison Frater, Barbara Barrett, Angus Cameron and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter FonagyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK. p.fonagy@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0091
Jessica YakeleyPortman Clinic, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tessa GardnerAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Elizabeth SimesResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Mary McMurranInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Paul MoranCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences Department, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mike CrawfordCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Alison FraterSchool of Law, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.
Barbara BarrettInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Angus CameronNational Probation Service London Division, London, UK.
James WasonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stephen PillingResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Stephen ButlerPsychology Department, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada.
Anthony BatemanResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Anna Freud Centre · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBHM Prison and Probation Service · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBThe Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 14/186/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntisocial personality disorder (ASPD), although associated with very significant health and social burden, is an under-researched mental disorder for which clinically effective and cost-effective treatment methods are urgently needed. No intervention has been established for prevention or as the treatment of choice for this disorder. Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is a psychotherapeutic treatment that has shown some promising preliminary results for reducing personality disorder symptomatology by specifically targeting the ability to recognize and understand the mental states of oneself and others, an ability that is compromised in people with ASPD. This paper describes the protocol of a multi-site RCT designed to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MBT for reducing aggression and alleviating the wider symptoms of ASPD in male offenders subject to probation supervision who fulfil diagnostic criteria for ASPD.

methodsThree hundred and two participants recruited from a pool of offenders subject to statutory supervision by the National Probation Service at 13 sites across the UK will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to 12 months of probation plus MBT or standard probation as usual, with follow-up to 24 months post-randomization. The primary outcome is frequency of aggressive antisocial behaviour as assessed by the Overt Aggression Scale - Modified. Secondary outcomes include violence, offending rates, alcohol use, drug use, mental health status, quality of life, and total service use costs. Data will be gathered from police and criminal justice databases, NHS record linkage, and interviews and self-report measures administered to participants. Primary analysis will be on an intent-to-treat basis; per-protocol analysis will be undertaken as secondary analysis. The primary outcome will be analysed using hierarchical mixed-effects linear regression. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using mixed-effects linear regression, mixed-effects logistic regression, and mixed-effects Poisson models for secondary outcomes depending on whether the outcome is continuous, binary, or count data. A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: This definitive, national, multi-site trial is of sufficient size to evaluate MBT to inform policymakers, service commissioners, clinicians, and service users about its potential to treat offenders with ASPD and the likely impact on the population at risk.

trial registrationISRCTN 32309003 . Registered on 8 April 2016.

Indexed as

CriminalsMentalizationAdultAntisocial Personality DisorderHumansMaleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAggressionAntisocial personality disorderEconomic evaluationMentalization-based treatmentOffendersPatient and public involvementPersonality disorderProbationRandomized controlled trialViolence

Identifiers

PMID33287865
PMCPMC7720544
OpenAlexW3113235054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.