Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287864›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

Electrical impedance tomography to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

François Perier, Samuel Tuffet, Tommaso Maraffi, Glasiele Alcala, Marcus Victor, Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, Keyvan Razazi, Nicolas De Prost, Marcelo Amato, Guillaume Carteaux and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Time-domain and 3D methods for lung perfusion data clustering in electrical impedance tomography.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  12. Noise effect analysis and pulmonary perfusion estimation in electrical impedance tomography.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Research progress on electrical impedance tomography in pulmonary perfusion].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

François PerierAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France. francois.perier@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-1617
Samuel TuffetAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Tommaso MaraffiAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Glasiele AlcalaPulmonary Division, Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcus VictorPulmonary Division, Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anne-Fleur HaudebourgAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Keyvan RazaziAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Nicolas De ProstAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Marcelo AmatoPulmonary Division, Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guillaume CarteauxAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Armand Mekontso DessapAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 51, Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil Cedex, France.
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatients with coronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) could have a specific physiological phenotype as compared with those affected by ARDS from other causes (NC-ARDS).

objectivesTo describe the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory mechanics in C-ARDS patients in supine and prone position, and as compared to NC-ARDS. The primary endpoint was the best PEEP defined as the smallest sum of hyperdistension and collapse.

methodsSeventeen patients with moderate-to-severe C-ARDS were monitored by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and evaluated during PEEP titration in supine (n = 17) and prone (n = 14) position and compared with 13 NC-ARDS patients investigated by EIT in our department before the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsAs compared with NC-ARDS, C-ARDS exhibited a higher median best PEEP (defined using EIT as the smallest sum of hyperdistension and collapse, 12 [9, 12] vs. 9 [6, 9] cmH

conclusionAn intermediate PEEP level seems appropriate in half of our C-ARDS patients. There is no solid evidence that compliance at low PEEP could predict the response to PEEP.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Electric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory MechanicsTomography, X-Ray ComputedARDSCOVID-19Electrical impedance tomographyMechanical ventilationPEEP

Identifiers

PMID33287864
PMCPMC7719729
OpenAlexW3111911371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.