Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287861›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2020

Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kollengode Ramanathan, Nicholas Yeo, Peta Alexander, Lakshmi Raman, Ryan Barbaro, Chuen Seng Tan, Luregn J Schlapbach, Graeme MacLaren

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Central or Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pediatric Sepsis: Outcomes Comparison in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Dataset, 2000-2021.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children: A brief review.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Kollengode RamanathanCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. ram_ramanathan@nuhs.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-9455
Nicholas YeoQueen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Belfast, UK.
Peta AlexanderDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lakshmi RamanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Ryan BarbaroDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Chuen Seng TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Luregn J SchlapbachDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and Neonatology, and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Graeme MacLarenCardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGBoston Children's Hospital · USQueen's University Belfast · GBThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Training to Advance Care Through Implementation Science in Cardiac And Lung Illnesses (TACTICAL)K12HL138039 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS, PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in children with sepsis remain controversial. Current guidelines on management of septic shock in children recommend consideration of ECMO as salvage therapy. We sought to review peer-reviewed publications on effectiveness of ECMO in children with sepsis.

methodsStudies reporting on mortality in children with sepsis supported with ECMO, published in PubMed, Scopus and Embase from 1972 till February 2020, were included in the review. This study was done in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement after registering the review protocol with PROSPERO. Study eligibility was independently assessed by two authors and disagreements resolved by a third author. Publications were reviewed for quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) were conducted, and 95% confidence intervals were computed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Outliers were identified by the Baujat plot and leave-one-out analysis if there was considerable heterogeneity. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge. Secondary outcome measures included hospital length of stay, subgroup analysis of neonatal and paediatric groups, types and duration of ECMO and complications .

resultsOf the 2054 articles screened, we identified 23 original articles for systematic review and meta-analysis. Cumulative estimate of survival (13 studies, 2559 patients) in the cohort was 59% (95%CI: 51-67%). Patients had a median length of hospital stay of 28.8 days, median intensive care unit stay of 13.5 days, and median ECMO duration of 129 h. Children needing venoarterial ECMO (9 studies, 208 patients) showed overall pooled survival of 65% (95%CI: 50-80%). Neonates (< 4 weeks of age) with sepsis needing ECMO (7 studies, 85 neonates) had pooled survival of 73% (95%CI: 56- 87%). Gram positive organisms were the most common pathogens (47%) in septic children supported with ECMO.

conclusionSurvival rates of children with sepsis needing ECMO was 59%. Neonates had higher survival rates (73%); gram positive organisms accounted for most common infections in children needing ECMO. Despite limitations, pooled survival data from this review indicates consideration of ECMO in refractory septic shock for all pediatric age groups.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleSepsisSurvival RateNeonatalPediatricSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID33287861
PMCPMC7720382
OpenAlexW3110867614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.