Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287744›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

TRIM study protocol - a prospective randomized multicenter Trial to assess the Role of Imaging during follow-up after radical surgery of stage IIB-C and III cutaneous malignant Melanoma.

Ylva Naeser, Hildur Helgadottir, Yvonne Brandberg, Johan Hansson, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Nils O Elander, Christian Ingvar, Karolin Isaksson, Petra Flygare, Cecilia Nilsson and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03116412 (A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial to Assess the Role of Imaging During Follow Up After Radical Surgery of Stage IIb-c and III Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03116412 narecruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial to Assess the Role of Imaging During Follow Up After Radical Surgery of Stage IIb-c and III Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2017 to 2028Enrolled1,300ConditionsMalignant MelanomaArmsCT or PET scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Real-world management of adjuvant systemic melanoma therapy: Multi-center survey of 51 DeCOG skin cancer centers.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ylva NaeserDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck laboratory, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hildur HelgadottirDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17164, Solna, Sweden.
Yvonne BrandbergDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan HanssonDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17164, Solna, Sweden.
Roger Olofsson BaggeSahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nils O ElanderDepartment of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Christian IngvarDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, BMC F12, 22184, Lund, Sweden.
Karolin IsakssonDepartment of Surgery, Central Hospital Kristianstad, 29133, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Petra FlygareDepartment of Oncology, Sundsvall County Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 21, 856 43, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Cecilia NilssonDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Västmanland Västerås, 72189, Västerås, Sweden.
Frida JakobssonDepartment of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, 70185, Örebro, Sweden.
Olga Del Val MunozDepartment of Oncology, Gävle County Hospital, 80187, Gävle, Sweden.
Antonis ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Malin JanssonDepartment of Surgical and perioperative sciences, Umeå University and Umeå University Hospital, 90185, Umeå, Sweden.
Charlotte SparringDepartment of Dermatology, Skaraborg County Hospital, 54185, Skövde, Sweden.
Lars OhlssonDepartment of Surgery, Karlstad County Hospital, Rosenborgsgatan 9, 65230, Karlstad, Sweden.
Ulf DyrkeDepartment of Surgery, Falun County Hospital, 79182, Falun, Sweden.
Dimitrios PapantoniouDepartment of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, 55185, Jönköping, Sweden.
Anders SundinDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology & Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gustav J UllenhagDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck laboratory, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden. gustav.ullenhag@igp.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-3267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is increasing worldwide. In Sweden, over 4600 cases were diagnosed in 2018. The prognosis after radical surgery varies considerably with tumor stage. In recent years, new treatment options have become available for metastatic CMM. Early onset of treatment seems to improve outcome, which suggests that early detection of recurrent disease should be beneficial. Consequently, in several countries imaging is a part of the routine follow-up program after surgery of high risk CMM. However, imaging has drawbacks, including resources required (costs, personnel, equipment) and the radiation exposure. Furthermore, many patients experience anxiety in waiting for the imaging results and investigations of irrelevant findings is another factor that also could cause worry and lead to decreased quality of life. Hence, the impact of imaging in this setting is important to address and no randomized study has previously been conducted. The Swedish national guidelines stipulate follow-up for 3 years by clinical examinations only.

methodsThe TRIM study is a prospective randomized multicenter trial evaluating the potential benefit of imaging and blood tests during follow-up after radical surgery for high-risk CMM, compared to clinical examinations only. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) at 5 years. Secondary endpoints are survival from diagnosis of relapse and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Eligible for inclusion are patients radically operated for CMM stage IIB-C or III with sufficient renal function for iv contrast-enhanced CT and who are expected to be fit for treatment in case of recurrence. The planned number of patients is > 1300. Patients are randomized to clinical examinations for 3 years +/- whole-body imaging with CT or FDG-PET/CT and laboratory tests including S100B protein and LDH. This academic study is supported by the Swedish Melanoma Study Group. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized prospective trial on the potential benefit of imaging as a part of the follow-up scheme after radical surgery for high-risk CMM.

resultsThe first patient was recruited in June 2017 and as of April 2020, almost 500 patients had been included at 19 centers in Sweden.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03116412 . Registered 17 April 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03116412.

Indexed as

Cutaneous Malignant MelanomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMelanomaMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin NeoplasmsCTCutaneous malignant melanomaFDG-PET/CTFollow-up

Identifiers

PMID33287744
PMCPMC7720485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.