Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287715›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2020

Distraction by a cognitive task has a higher impact on electrophysiological measures compared with conditioned pain modulation.

A T L Do, E K Enax-Krumova, Ö Özgül, L B Eitner, S Heba, M Tegenthoff, C Maier, O Höffken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A T L DoDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
E K Enax-KrumovaDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. elena.krumova@rub.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-9414
Ö ÖzgülDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
L B EitnerDepartment of Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
S HebaDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
M Tegenthoff
C MaierDepartment of Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
O HöffkenDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 874/A1 and A5, Project No.: 122679504Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung endowed professorship (2020-2026)Medizinische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum K 120-18Medizinische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum K135-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConditioned pain modulation (CPM) evaluates the effect of a painful conditioning stimulus (CS) on a painful test stimulus (TS). Using painful cutaneous electrical stimulation (PCES) as TS and painful cold water as CS, the pain relief was paralleled by a decrease in evoked potentials (PCES-EPs). We now aimed to compare the effect of CPM with cognitive distraction on PCES-induced pain and PCES-EP amplitudes.

methodsPCES was performed using surface electrodes inducing a painful sensation of 60 (NRS 0-100) on one hand. In a crossover design healthy subjects (included: n = 38, analyzed: n = 23) immersed the contralateral hand into 10 °C cold water (CS) for CPM evaluation and performed the 1-back task for cognitive distraction. Before and during the CS and 1-back task, respectively, subjects rated the pain intensity of PCES and simultaneously cortical evoked potentials were recorded.

resultsBoth CPM and cognitive distraction significantly reduced PCES-EP amplitudes (CPM: 27.6 ± 12.0 μV to 20.2 ± 9.5 μV, cognitive distraction: 30.3 ± 14.2 µV to 13.6 ± 5.2 μV, p < 0.001) and PCES-induced pain (on a 0-100 numerical rating scale: CPM: 58 ± 4 to 41.1 ± 12.3, cognitive distraction: 58.3 ± 4.4 to 38.0 ± 13.0, p < 0.001), though the changes in pain intensity and PCES-amplitude did not correlate. The changes of the PCES-EP amplitudes during cognitive distraction were more pronounced than during CPM (p = 0.001).

conclusionsCPM and cognitive distraction reduced the PCES-induced pain to a similar extent. The more pronounced decrease of PCES-EP amplitudes after distraction by a cognitive task implies that both conditions might not represent the general pain modulatory capacity of individuals, but may underlie different neuronal mechanisms with the final common pathway of perceived pain reduction.

Indexed as

AdultCerebral CortexCognitionCold TemperatureConditioning, PsychologicalCross-Over StudiesElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked PotentialsFemaleFunctional LateralityHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePainPain ManagementCognitive distractionConditioned pain modulationPainful cutaneous electrical stimulationPain mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID33287715
PMCPMC7720448
OpenAlexW3111823929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.