Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Analysing Credibility of UK Social Media Influencers' Weight-Management Blogs: A Pilot Study.

Christina Sabbagh, Emma Boyland, Catherine Hankey, Alison Parrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How does the food environment influence people engaged in weight management? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. #Fail: the quality and accuracy of nutrition-related information by influential Australian Instagram accounts.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Determinants of the Perceived Credibility of Rebuttals Concerning Health Misinformation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina SabbaghHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
Emma BoylandDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-4994
Catherine HankeyHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.
Alison ParrettHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-5398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media influencers (SMI) are individuals with large follower engagement, who can shape the thoughts and dietary behaviours of their audience. Concerns exist surrounding the spread of dietary misinformation by SMI, which may impact negatively on public health, yet no standards currently exist to assess the credibility of their information. This study aimed to evaluate the credibility of key SMI weight management (WM) blogs (

Indexed as

BloggingSocial MediaWeight Reduction ProgramsDietHumansPilot ProjectsUnited Kingdomblogsevidence-basednutritionsocial media influencersweight management

Identifiers

PMID33287374
PMCPMC7731114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.