Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287300›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

The "Fortilat" Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Auxological Outcome at 18 Months of Age.

Chiara Peila, Elena Spada, Enrico Bertino, Sonia Deantoni, Federica Percivati, Guido E Moro, Marzia Giribaldi, Laura Cavallarin, Francesco Cresi, Alessandra Coscia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiara PeilaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0075-5353
Elena SpadaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Enrico BertinoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Sonia DeantoniDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Federica PercivatiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Guido E MoroItalian Association of Human Milk Banks, Via Libero Temolo 4, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-3257
Marzia GiribaldiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-7684
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-1683
Francesco CresiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2139-6855
Alessandra CosciaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human milk fortification is a routine clinical practice for feeding preterm infants. We hypothesized that donkey milk can be a suitable basis for developing an innovative human milk fortifier. Our randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial, named "Fortilat", evaluated the feeding tolerance, growth and clinical short-term outcomes in a population of preterm infants fed with a novel multi-component fortifier and a protein concentrate derived from donkey milk. The aim of the current study is to extend the previous findings and to evaluate the auxological outcomes of the infants enrolled in the "Fortilat" trial at 18 months of age. In the previous trial "Fortilat", the fortification protocol followed was the same for the two groups, and the two diets were designed to be isoproteic and isocaloric. All infants enrolled in the trial were included in a premature infant developmental evaluation program consisting of hospital visits at 40 ± 1 weeks of postmenstrual age, and at 6, 12 and 18 months of corrected age. Weight, head circumference and length were expressed in z-score using neonatal Intergrowth21st and INeS charts at birth, and WHO 0-5 years growth charts at 18 months. 122 children (Bovine-arm = 62, Donkey-arm = 60) were included in this study. All the observations were recorded in the interval of 18 ± 3 months of the correct age. The two groups did not differ for head circumference, length or weight at 18 months of age. Our data show that fortifiers derived from donkey milk had not different long term auxological outcomes of standard bovine-derived fortifier, but the new donkey milk fortifier was well tolerated in our population.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedMilkAnimalsBody WeightCattleCephalometryEquidaeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMaleMilk, Humanadjustable fortificationauxological outcomescatch-up growthdonkey milkhuman milkhuman milk fortifierpreterm infantsVLBW infants

Identifiers

PMID33287300
PMCPMC7761645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.