Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287253›Full record

ReviewToxins2020

Monika Urbaniak, Agnieszka Waśkiewicz, Łukasz Stępień

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome Sequencing of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Updates on the Secondary Metabolites fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika UrbaniakPlant-Pathogen Interaction Team, Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-4556
Agnieszka WaśkiewiczDepartment of Chemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60-625 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4113-1595
Łukasz StępieńPlant-Pathogen Interaction Team, Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9740-9520
Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki NCN 2014/15/B/NZ9/01544Narodowe Centrum Nauki NCN 2017/25/N/NZ9/02525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the fungi from the

Indexed as

DepsipeptidesFusariumMycotoxinsAnimal FeedFood ContaminationDepsipeptidesMycotoxinsbeauvericinenniatinFusariummycotoxin contaminationphytopathogenssecondary metabolism

Identifiers

PMID33287253
PMCPMC7761704
OpenAlexW3113010602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.