Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33287027›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Modeling the Device Behavior of Biological and Synthetic Nanopores with Reduced Models.

Dezső Boda, Mónika Valiskó, Dirk Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dezső BodaDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Pannonia, P.O. Box 158, H-8201 Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-1247
Mónika ValiskóDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Pannonia, P.O. Box 158, H-8201 Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-1130
Dirk GillespieDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-5352

Funding

GINOP GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00053Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal K124353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological ion channels and synthetic nanopores are responsible for passive transport of ions through a membrane between two compartments. Modeling these ionic currents is especially amenable to reduced models because the device functions of these pores, the relation of input parameters (e.g., applied voltage, bath concentrations) and output parameters (e.g., current, rectification, selectivity), are well defined. Reduced models focus on the physics that produces the device functions (i.e., the physics of how inputs become outputs) rather than the atomic/molecular-scale physics inside the pore. Here, we propose four rules of thumb for constructing good reduced models of ion channels and nanopores. They are about (1) the importance of the axial concentration profiles, (2) the importance of the pore charges, (3) choosing the right explicit degrees of freedom, and (4) creating the proper response functions. We provide examples for how each rule of thumb helps in creating a reduced model of device behavior.

Indexed as

classical density functional theoryion channelsMonte CarlonanoporesPoisson-Nernst-Planckreduced models

Identifiers

PMID33287027
PMCPMC7711659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.