Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286857›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Geometrical Divide of Data Particle in Gravitational Classification of Moons and Circles Data Sets.

Łukasz Rybak, Janusz Dudczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Łukasz RybakInstitute of Information Technology and Technical Sciences, Stefan Batory State University, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.
Janusz DudczykInstitute of Information Technology and Technical Sciences, Stefan Batory State University, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thus far, the Universal Law of Gravitation has found application in many issues related to pattern classification. Its popularity results from its clear theoretical foundations and the competitive effectiveness of the classifiers based on it. Both Moons and Circles data sets constitute distinctive types of data sets that can be found in machine learning. Despite the fact that they have not been formally defined yet, on the basis of their visualization, they can be defined as sets in which the distribution of objects of individual classes creates shapes similar to circles or semicircles. This article makes an attempt to improve the gravitational classifier that creates a data particle based on the class. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of the developed Geometrical Divide method with the popular method of creating a class-based data particle, which is described by a compound of 1 ÷ 1 cardinality in the Moons and Circles data sets classification process. The research made use of eight artificially generated data sets, which contained classes that were explicitly separated from each other as well as data sets with objects of different classes that did overlap each other. Within the limits of the conducted experiments, the Geometrical Divide method was combined with several algorithms for determining the mass of a data particle. The research did also use the

Indexed as

centroid-based classifierclassificationdata particle dividedata particle modellinggravitational classification

Identifiers

PMID33286857
PMCPMC7597181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.