ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Generalized Nonlinear Least Squares Method for the Calibration of Complex Computer Code Using a Gaussian Process Surrogate.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Accurate Indoor Positioning: An RSS-Based Fusion of UWB and Machine-Learning-Enhanced WiFi.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Computational Methods in the Modeling of Complex Systems.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for the Calibration of Complex Simulator Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The approximated nonlinear least squares (ALS) method has been used for the estimation of unknown parameters in the complex computer code which is very time-consuming to execute. The ALS calibrates or tunes the computer code by minimizing the squared difference between real observations and computer output using a surrogate such as a Gaussian process model. When the differences (residuals) are correlated or heteroscedastic, the ALS may result in a distorted code tuning with a large variance of estimation. Another potential drawback of the ALS is that it does not take into account the uncertainty in the approximation of the computer model by a surrogate. To address these problems, we propose a generalized ALS (GALS) by constructing the covariance matrix of residuals. The inverse of the covariance matrix is multiplied to the residuals, and it is minimized with respect to the tuning parameters. In addition, we consider an iterative version for the GALS, which is called as the max-minG algorithm. In this algorithm, the parameters are re-estimated and updated by the maximum likelihood estimation and the GALS, by using both computer and experimental data repeatedly until convergence. Moreover, the iteratively re-weighted ALS method (IRWALS) was considered for a comparison purpose. Five test functions in different conditions are examined for a comparative analysis of the four methods. Based on the test function study, we find that both the bias and variance of estimates obtained from the proposed methods (the GALS and the max-minG) are smaller than those from the ALS and the IRWALS methods. Especially, the max-minG works better than others including the GALS for the relatively complex test functions. Lastly, an application to a nuclear fusion simulator is illustrated and it is shown that the abnormal pattern of residuals in the ALS can be resolved by the proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.