Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286675›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

From Knowledge Transmission to Knowledge Construction: A Step towards Human-Like Active Learning.

Ilona Kulikovskikh, Tomislav Lipic, Tomislav Šmuc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilona KulikovskikhDepartment of Information Systems and Technologies, Samara National Research University, Moskovskoe Shosse 34, 443086 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6653-5978
Tomislav LipicDivision of Electronics, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-8198
Tomislav ŠmucDivision of Electronics, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-9384

Funding

European Regional Development Fund KK.01.1.1.01.0009Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation 074-U01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machines usually employ a guess-and-check strategy to analyze data: they take the data, make a guess, check the answer, adjust it with regard to the correct one if necessary, and try again on a new data set. An active learning environment guarantees better performance while training on less, but carefully chosen, data which reduces the costs of both annotating and analyzing large data sets. This issue becomes even more critical for deep learning applications. Human-like active learning integrates a variety of strategies and instructional models chosen by a teacher to contribute to learners' knowledge, while machine active learning strategies lack versatile tools for shifting the focus of instruction away from knowledge transmission to learners' knowledge construction. We approach this gap by considering an active learning environment in an educational setting. We propose a new strategy that measures the information capacity of data using the information function from the four-parameter logistic item response theory (4PL IRT). We compared the proposed strategy with the most common active learning strategies-Least Confidence and Entropy Sampling. The results of computational experiments showed that the Information Capacity strategy shares similar behavior but provides a more flexible framework for building transparent knowledge models in deep learning.

Indexed as

active learningdeep learningitem informationitem response theorymultiple-choice testingpool-based sampling

Identifiers

PMID33286675
PMCPMC7517531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.