Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286625›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Direct and Indirect Effects-An Information Theoretic Perspective.

Gabriel Schamberg, William Chapman, Shang-Ping Xie, Todd P Coleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Information Theoretic Measures and Their Applications.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel SchambergPicower Institute for Memory and Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4188-9614
William ChapmanScripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-7069
Shang-Ping XieScripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3676-1325
Todd P ColemanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

Behavioral, Physiological, and Quantitative Models of Pro-Social BehaviorR01MH110514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIBA, ANDREA ANGELIDES, COLEMAN, TODD P · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NIH HHS 1R01MH110514NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information theoretic (IT) approaches to quantifying causal influences have experienced some popularity in the literature, in both theoretical and applied (e.g., neuroscience and climate science) domains. While these causal measures are desirable in that they are model agnostic and can capture non-linear interactions, they are fundamentally different from common statistical notions of causal influence in that they (1) compare distributions over the effect rather than values of the effect and (2) are defined with respect to random variables representing a cause rather than specific values of a cause. We here present IT measures of direct, indirect, and total causal effects. The proposed measures are unlike existing IT techniques in that they enable measuring causal effects that are defined with respect to specific values of a cause while still offering the flexibility and general applicability of IT techniques. We provide an identifiability result and demonstrate application of the proposed measures in estimating the causal effect of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation on temperature anomalies in the North American Pacific Northwest.

Indexed as

causalityEl Niño–Southern oscillationKL divergencemediation analysisspecific information

Identifiers

PMID33286625
PMCPMC7517455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.