ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Mathematical Models of Consciousness.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor and operative intentionality in computational phenomenology: from shallow to deep active inference models.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Is my "red" your "red"?: Evaluating structural correspondences between color similarity judgments using unsupervised alignment.iScience · 2025Article
- A neuroimaging dataset during sequential color qualia similarity judgments with and without reports.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Qualia structures collapse for geometric shapes, but not faces, when spatial attention is withdrawn.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Sources of richness and ineffability for phenomenally conscious states.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- Holographic Duality and the Physics of Consciousness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Model Unity and the Unity of Consciousness: Developments in Expected Float Entropy Minimisation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Explanatory profiles of models of consciousness - towards a systematic classification.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Review
- What it is like to be a bit: an integrated information decomposition account of emergent mental phenomena.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Article
- A relational approach to consciousness: categories of level and contents of consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, promising mathematical models have been proposed that aim to describe conscious experience and its relation to the physical domain. Whereas the axioms and metaphysical ideas of these theories have been carefully motivated, their mathematical formalism has not. In this article, we aim to remedy this situation. We give an account of what warrants mathematical representation of phenomenal experience, derive a general mathematical framework that takes into account consciousness' epistemic context, and study which mathematical structures some of the key characteristics of conscious experience imply, showing precisely where mathematical approaches allow to go beyond what the standard methodology can do. The result is a general mathematical framework for models of consciousness that can be employed in the theory-building process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.