Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286352›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Method to Present and Analyze Ensembles of Information Sources.

Nicholas M Timme, David Linsenbardt, Christopher C Lapish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas M TimmeDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-4418
David LinsenbardtDepartment of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Christopher C LapishDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Funding

Understanding neurophysiological deficits in response inhibition in children with FASDP50AA022534 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Carlos Fernando Valenzuela · 2014 to 2026
$21.5M
Repeated Binge Drinking and the Genetic Regulation of Corticostriatal SynchronyR00AA025120 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2020 to 2022
$993k
Repeated Binge Drinking and the Genetic Regulation of Corticostriatal SynchronyK99AA025120 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$316k
Electrophysiological ensembles organization during alcohol cue-induced intake andF32AA022268 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2013 to 2015
$155k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA022268NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA025120NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA022534NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA025120NIH HHS AA007462NIH HHS AA007611NIH HHS AA022268NIH HHS AA022821NIH HHS AA023786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information theory is a powerful tool for analyzing complex systems. In many areas of neuroscience, it is now possible to gather data from large ensembles of neural variables (e.g., data from many neurons, genes, or voxels). The individual variables can be analyzed with information theory to provide estimates of information shared between variables (forming a network between variables), or between neural variables and other variables (e.g., behavior or sensory stimuli). However, it can be difficult to (1) evaluate if the ensemble is significantly different from what would be expected in a purely noisy system and (2) determine if two ensembles are different. Herein, we introduce relatively simple methods to address these problems by analyzing ensembles of information sources. We demonstrate how an ensemble built of mutual information connections can be compared to null surrogate data to determine if the ensemble is significantly different from noise. Next, we show how two ensembles can be compared using a randomization process to determine if the sources in one contain more information than the other. All code necessary to carry out these analyses and demonstrations are provided.

Indexed as

ensemble comparisongenetic networkinformation ensembleinformation theorymutual informationneural ensemblepopulation codingpopulation study

Identifiers

PMID33286352
PMCPMC7517101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.