Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286267›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Using the Information Provided by Forbidden Ordinal Patterns in Permutation Entropy to Reinforce Time Series Discrimination Capabilities.

David Cuesta-Frau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Slope Entropy Characterisation: The Role of theEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David Cuesta-FrauTechnological Institute of Informatics, Universitat Politècnica de València, 03801 Alcoi Campus, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0076-0515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its widely tested and proven usefulness, there is still room for improvement in the basic permutation entropy (PE) algorithm, as several subsequent studies have demonstrated in recent years. Some of these new methods try to address the well-known PE weaknesses, such as its focus only on ordinal and not on amplitude information, and the possible detrimental impact of equal values found in subsequences. Other new methods address less specific weaknesses, such as the PE results' dependence on input parameter values, a common problem found in many entropy calculation methods. The lack of discriminating power among classes in some cases is also a generic problem when entropy measures are used for data series classification. This last problem is the one specifically addressed in the present study. Toward that purpose, the classification performance of the standard PE method was first assessed by conducting several time series classification tests over a varied and diverse set of data. Then, this performance was reassessed using a new Shannon Entropy normalisation scheme proposed in this paper: divide the relative frequencies in PE by the number of different ordinal patterns actually found in the time series, instead of by the theoretically expected number. According to the classification accuracy obtained, this last approach exhibited a higher class discriminating power. It was capable of finding significant differences in six out of seven experimental datasets-whereas the standard PE method only did in four-and it also had better classification accuracy. It can be concluded that using the additional information provided by the number of forbidden/found patterns, it is possible to achieve a higher discriminating power than using the classical PE normalisation method. The resulting algorithm is also very similar to that of PE and very easy to implement.

Indexed as

forbidden patternsordinal patternspermutation entropysignal classification

Identifiers

PMID33286267
PMCPMC7516977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.