ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Using the Information Provided by Forbidden Ordinal Patterns in Permutation Entropy to Reinforce Time Series Discrimination Capabilities.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new network representation for time series analysis from the perspective of combinatorial property of ordinal patterns.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Slope Entropy Normalisation by Means of Analytical and Heuristic Reference Values.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Slope Entropy Characterisation: The Role of theEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- On the Genuine Relevance of the Data-Driven Signal Decomposition-Based Multiscale Permutation Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its widely tested and proven usefulness, there is still room for improvement in the basic permutation entropy (PE) algorithm, as several subsequent studies have demonstrated in recent years. Some of these new methods try to address the well-known PE weaknesses, such as its focus only on ordinal and not on amplitude information, and the possible detrimental impact of equal values found in subsequences. Other new methods address less specific weaknesses, such as the PE results' dependence on input parameter values, a common problem found in many entropy calculation methods. The lack of discriminating power among classes in some cases is also a generic problem when entropy measures are used for data series classification. This last problem is the one specifically addressed in the present study. Toward that purpose, the classification performance of the standard PE method was first assessed by conducting several time series classification tests over a varied and diverse set of data. Then, this performance was reassessed using a new Shannon Entropy normalisation scheme proposed in this paper: divide the relative frequencies in PE by the number of different ordinal patterns actually found in the time series, instead of by the theoretically expected number. According to the classification accuracy obtained, this last approach exhibited a higher class discriminating power. It was capable of finding significant differences in six out of seven experimental datasets-whereas the standard PE method only did in four-and it also had better classification accuracy. It can be concluded that using the additional information provided by the number of forbidden/found patterns, it is possible to achieve a higher discriminating power than using the classical PE normalisation method. The resulting algorithm is also very similar to that of PE and very easy to implement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.