Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286263›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Comparison of Outlier-Tolerant Models for Measuring Visual Complexity.

Adrian Carballal, Carlos Fernandez-Lozano, Nereida Rodriguez-Fernandez, Iria Santos, Juan Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian CarballalCITIC-Research Center of Information and Communication Technologies, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-7318
Carlos Fernandez-LozanoCITIC-Research Center of Information and Communication Technologies, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-5677
Nereida Rodriguez-FernandezCITIC-Research Center of Information and Communication Technologies, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-5253
Iria SantosCITIC-Research Center of Information and Communication Technologies, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-3890
Juan RomeroCITIC-Research Center of Information and Communication Technologies, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5566-5382

Funding

Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431G/01, ED431D 2017/16, Ref. ED431D 2017/23,Ref. ED431C 2018/49Instituto de Salud Carlos III Pl17/01826Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness UNLC08-1E-002, UNLC13-13-3503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing the visual complexity of an image in terms of impact or aesthetic preference can be of great applicability in areas such as psychology or marketing. To this end, certain areas such as Computer Vision have focused on identifying features and computational models that allow for satisfactory results. This paper studies the application of recent ML models using input images evaluated by humans and characterized by features related to visual complexity. According to the experiments carried out, it was confirmed that one of these methods, Correlation by Genetic Search (CGS), based on the search for minimum sets of features that maximize the correlation of the model with respect to the input data, predicted human ratings of image visual complexity better than any other model referenced to date in terms of correlation, RMSE or minimum number of features required by the model. In addition, the variability of these terms were studied eliminating images considered as outliers in previous studies, observing the robustness of the method when selecting the most important variables to make the prediction.

Indexed as

compression errorcorrelationhuman-computer interactionmachine learningpsychiatry and psychologysisual complexityvisual stimuli

Identifiers

PMID33286263
PMCPMC7516971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.