Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286202›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Perceptions of ICT Practitioners Regarding Software Privacy.

Edna Dias Canedo, Angelica Toffano Seidel Calazans, Eloisa Toffano Seidel Masson, Pedro Henrique Teixeira Costa, Fernanda Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edna Dias CanedoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília (UnB), P.O. Box 4466, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2159-339X
Angelica Toffano Seidel CalazansUniversity center-UniCEUB, Brasília-DF 70790-075, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-4473
Eloisa Toffano Seidel MassonUniversity center-UniCEUB, Brasília-DF 70790-075, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-058X
Pedro Henrique Teixeira CostaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília (UnB), P.O. Box 4466, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-8314
Fernanda LimaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília (UnB), P.O. Box 4466, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-0238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During software development activities, it is important for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) practitioners to know and understand practices and guidelines regarding information privacy, as software requirements must comply with data privacy laws and members of development teams should know current legislation related to the protection of personal data. In order to gain a better understanding on how industry ICT practitioners perceive the practical relevance of software privacy and privacy requirements and how these professionals are implementing data privacy concepts, we conducted a survey with ICT practitioners from software development organizations to get an overview of how these professionals are implementing data privacy concepts during software design. We performed a systematic literature review to identify related works with software privacy and privacy requirements and what methodologies and techniques are used to specify them. In addition, we conducted a survey with ICT practitioners from different organizations. Findings revealed that ICT practitioners lack a comprehensive knowledge of software privacy and privacy requirements and the Brazilian General Data Protection Law

Indexed as

data privacygeneral law of personal data protectionICT practitioners’ perceptionprivacy requirementssoftware development process

Identifiers

PMID33286202
PMCPMC7516912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.