ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Information Bottleneck for Estimating Treatment Effects with Systematically Missing Covariates.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causally Informative Entropic Inequalities within Families of Distributions with Shared Marginals.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Causal Structure Learning with Conditional and Unique Information Groups-Decomposition Inequalities.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Interpretable generative deep learning: an illustration with single cell gene expression data.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Conducting Causal Analysis by Means of Approximating Probabilistic Truths.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Learning Extremal Representations with Deep Archetypal Analysis.International journal of computer vision · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating the effects of an intervention from high-dimensional observational data is a challenging problem due to the existence of confounding. The task is often further complicated in healthcare applications where a set of observations may be entirely missing for certain patients at test time, thereby prohibiting accurate inference. In this paper, we address this issue using an approach based on the information bottleneck to reason about the effects of interventions. To this end, we first train an information bottleneck to perform a low-dimensional compression of covariates by explicitly considering the relevance of information for treatment effects. As a second step, we subsequently use the compressed covariates to perform a transfer of relevant information to cases where data are missing during testing. In doing so, we can reliably and accurately estimate treatment effects even in the absence of a full set of covariate information at test time. Our results on two causal inference benchmarks and a real application for treating sepsis show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, without compromising interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.