Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286130›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Impact of General Anesthesia Guided by State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE) on Perioperative Stability in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients-A Prospective Observational Randomized Monocentric Study.

Anca Raluca Dinu, Alexandru Florin Rogobete, Sonia Elena Popovici, Ovidiu Horea Bedreag, Marius Papurica, Corina Maria Dumbuleu, Raluca Ramona Velovan, Daiana Toma, Corina Maria Georgescu, Lavinia Ioana Trache and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anca Raluca DinuFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Alexandru Florin RogobeteFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1286-4431
Sonia Elena PopoviciClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Ovidiu Horea BedreagFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Marius PapuricaFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Corina Maria DumbuleuClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Raluca Ramona VelovanClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Daiana TomaClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Corina Maria GeorgescuClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Lavinia Ioana TracheClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Claudiu BarsacClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Loredana LucaClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Bettina BuzziClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Andra MaghiarClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Mihai Alexandru SandescFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Samir RimawiClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Madalin Marian VaduvaClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Lavinia Melania BratuFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Paul Manuel LuminosuClinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Dorel SandescFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Romanian Society of Nephrology · ROVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed interventions in general surgery departments. Some of the most important aims in achieving perioperative stability in these patients is diminishing the impact of general anesthesia on the hemodynamic stability and the optimization of anesthetic drug doses based on the individual clinical profile of each patient. The objective of this study is the evaluation of the impact, as monitored through entropy (both state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE)), that the depth of anesthesia has on the hemodynamic stability, as well as the doses of volatile anesthetic. A prospective, observational, randomized, and monocentric study was carried out between January and December 2019 in the Clinic of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the "Pius Brînzeu" Emergency County Hospital in Timișoara, Romania. The patients included in the study were divided in two study groups: patients in Group A (target group) received multimodal monitoring, which included monitoring of standard parameters and of entropy (SE and RE); while the patients in Group B (control group) only received standard monitoring. The anesthetic dose in group A was optimized to achieve a target entropy of 40-60. A total of 68 patients met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to one of the two study groups: group A (N = 43) or group B (N = 25). There were no statistically significant differences identified between the two groups for both demographical and clinical characteristics (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences were identified for the number of hypotensive episodes (p = 0.011, 95% CI: [0.1851, 0.7042]) and for the number of episodes of bradycardia (p < 0.0001, 95% CI: [0.3296, 0.7923]). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the Sevoflurane consumption between the two study groups (p = 0.0498, 95% CI: [-0.3942, 0.9047]). The implementation of the multimodal monitoring protocol, including the standard parameters and the measurement of entropy for determining the depth of anesthesia (SE and RE) led to a considerable improvement in perioperative hemodynamic stability. Furthermore, optimizing the doses of anesthetic drugs based on the individual clinical profile of each patient led to a considerable decrease in drug consumption, as well as to a lower incidence of hemodynamic side-effects.

Indexed as

general anesthesiapatient safetyrecoveryresponse entropystate entropy

Identifiers

PMID33286130
PMCPMC7516829
OpenAlexW3005482182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.