Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33286054›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Thermodynamic Limits and Optimality of Microbial Growth.

Nima P Saadat, Tim Nies, Yvan Rousset, Oliver Ebenhöh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integrative Thermodynamic Strategies in Microbial Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Overall biomass yield on multiple nutrient sources.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Energetic scaling in microbial growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nima P SaadatInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-6591
Tim NiesInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-2971
Yvan RoussetInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9118-7178
Oliver EbenhöhInstitute of Quantitative and Theoretical Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7229-7398
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DECluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390686111Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 391465903H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 812616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding microbial growth with the use of mathematical models has a long history that dates back to the pioneering work of Jacques Monod in the 1940s. Monod's famous growth law expressed microbial growth rate as a simple function of the limiting nutrient concentration. However, to explain growth laws from underlying principles is extremely challenging. In the second half of the 20th century, numerous experimental approaches aimed at precisely measuring heat production during microbial growth to determine the entropy balance in a growing cell and to quantify the exported entropy. This has led to the development of thermodynamic theories of microbial growth, which have generated fundamental understanding and identified the principal limitations of the growth process. Although these approaches ignored metabolic details and instead considered microbial metabolism as a black box, modern theories heavily rely on genomic resources to describe and model metabolism in great detail to explain microbial growth. Interestingly, however, thermodynamic constraints are often included in modern modeling approaches only in a rather superficial fashion, and it appears that recent modeling approaches and classical theories are rather disconnected fields. To stimulate a closer interaction between these fields, we here review various theoretical approaches that aim at describing microbial growth based on thermodynamics and outline the resulting thermodynamic limits and optimality principles. We start with classical black box models of cellular growth, and continue with recent metabolic modeling approaches that include thermodynamics, before we place these models in the context of fundamental considerations based on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. We conclude by identifying conceptual overlaps between the fields and suggest how the various types of theories and models can be integrated. We outline how concepts from one approach may help to inform or constrain another, and we demonstrate how genome-scale models can be used to infer key black box parameters, such as the energy of formation or the degree of reduction of biomass. Such integration will allow understanding to what extent microbes can be viewed as thermodynamic machines, and how close they operate to theoretical optima.

Indexed as

anabolismbiotechnologycatabolismenergyentropymicrobial cultures

Identifiers

PMID33286054
PMCPMC7516730
OpenAlexW3010350587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.