ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Thermodynamic Limits and Optimality of Microbial Growth.
Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermo-flux: generation and analysis of thermodynamic-stoichiometric metabolic network models.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Integrative Thermodynamic Strategies in Microbial Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Overflow metabolism in bacterial, yeast, and mammalian cells: different names, same game.Molecular systems biology · 2025Review
- A Trade-off between Force and Flow May Lead to Reduced Entropy Production Rate during Faster Microbial Growth.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Overall biomass yield on multiple nutrient sources.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Theoretical Improvements in Enzyme Efficiency Associated with Noisy Rate Constants and Increased Dissipation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microbial Pathway Thermodynamics: Stoichiometric Models Unveil Anabolic and Catabolic Processes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The isothermal Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy reduction affects survival of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Current controversies on mechanisms controlling soil carbon storage: implications for interactions with practitioners and policy-makers. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2023Review
- Energetic scaling in microbial growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Unlocking Elementary Conversion Modes: ecmtool Unveils All Capabilities of Metabolic Networks.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding microbial growth with the use of mathematical models has a long history that dates back to the pioneering work of Jacques Monod in the 1940s. Monod's famous growth law expressed microbial growth rate as a simple function of the limiting nutrient concentration. However, to explain growth laws from underlying principles is extremely challenging. In the second half of the 20th century, numerous experimental approaches aimed at precisely measuring heat production during microbial growth to determine the entropy balance in a growing cell and to quantify the exported entropy. This has led to the development of thermodynamic theories of microbial growth, which have generated fundamental understanding and identified the principal limitations of the growth process. Although these approaches ignored metabolic details and instead considered microbial metabolism as a black box, modern theories heavily rely on genomic resources to describe and model metabolism in great detail to explain microbial growth. Interestingly, however, thermodynamic constraints are often included in modern modeling approaches only in a rather superficial fashion, and it appears that recent modeling approaches and classical theories are rather disconnected fields. To stimulate a closer interaction between these fields, we here review various theoretical approaches that aim at describing microbial growth based on thermodynamics and outline the resulting thermodynamic limits and optimality principles. We start with classical black box models of cellular growth, and continue with recent metabolic modeling approaches that include thermodynamics, before we place these models in the context of fundamental considerations based on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. We conclude by identifying conceptual overlaps between the fields and suggest how the various types of theories and models can be integrated. We outline how concepts from one approach may help to inform or constrain another, and we demonstrate how genome-scale models can be used to infer key black box parameters, such as the energy of formation or the degree of reduction of biomass. Such integration will allow understanding to what extent microbes can be viewed as thermodynamic machines, and how close they operate to theoretical optima.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.